Thursday, August 15, 2013

FW: The uncertain future of our children. . .

 

Peters…

 

Feed: Pastoral Meanderings
Posted on: Friday, August 09, 2013 5:00 AM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Peters)
Subject: The uncertain future of our children. . .

 

Glen Stanton at Gospel Coalition has done us all a favor with some fact checking of oft repeated truths that end up being taken as Gospel when, in truth, they are distortions of the truth at best and downright lies at worst.

Here he tackles those who put the fear of God in parents, suggesting that their children will face an uncertain future as to their faith -- no matter what the parents do.  It has sold a lot of book and been the chatter at many conferences on the future shape of Christianity.

Stanton:

A handful of Christian authors have created a bit of a cottage industry peddling the scary news that the odds are not good that our young people stay strong in their faith into adulthood. Untrue.

There are important, effective, and relatively simple things parents and Christian workers can do to substantially increase the likelihood our young people will retain a thriving faith into and through their adult years. This is revealed in very strong, sophisticated research from some of the leading sociologists of youth and religion in the world.

Influencers of Faith

In the National Study of Youth and Religion (NSYR), noted Notre Dame professor Christian Smith and his team found:
• There are relatively simple factors that "powerfully shape" faith that remains strong through life.
• The biggest influencing factor is the faith of parents themselves and the practices they employ with their teenagers.
• These practices are simpler than many parents might imagine.
Increasing the likelihood of enduring faith in our young people is not limited to super-spiritual parents. In fact, the more "regular" and human you are the better. The factors, listed by the power of their influence, are:

Parents: Parents with a vibrant and lived-out faith tend to have children who have and keep a vibrant, lived-out faith. Smith doesn't mince words: "Parents are huge, absolutely huge, nearly a necessary condition" for a child to remain strong in his or her faith into young adulthood. He concludes "without question, the most important pastor a child will ever have in their life is a parent."

Personal Devotion: Along with at least one believing parent, it is important for the child to develop some practice and habit of regular prayer, church attendance, and reading of Scripture, growing in the conviction and experience that these practices are important for a happy life with God and others. And this practice doesn't have to be perfect, only relatively consistent. If teens and pre-teens have this in their younger years, they are remarkably more likely to maintain these faith practices into adulthood. It is important that this practice be learned and developed as an organic, natural part of their lives, rather than something they are expected to do solely out of duty or parental expectation. A faith developed as one's own tends to remain one's own.

Support/Encouragement from "Satellite Adults": Young people with lasting faith have the support of other adults around them who have a strong and inviting faith practice. These "satellite adults" who hover around our children in close relationship serve in supporting, affirming, and often times adding to the faith our children experience at home. They are powerful because our children observe, "If Coach Johnson/Principal Simpson/Youth Pastor Nigel/Deacon Stevenson/Aunt Wilma are such great people and so passionate and honest in their faith, maybe there's really something to it beyond what my parents think."
Our kids need to have the faith they learn at home supported and encouraged by the larger ring of admired adults around them.

Beliefs: Not as vital as the first three, but it helps if your child has some specific strongly held beliefs and practices.

First, a commitment to sexual chastity is critical for interesting reasons. Sexuality being such a powerful part of developing in one's teen and young adult years, having strong convictions and practices here indicate the presence of other deeply held and mature convictions regarding behavior. These usually cluster with faith convictions. It strengthens what these researchers call "cognitive resistance to modern secular culture."
Second, youth with lasting faith have the ability and support in honestly wrestling with and resolving their faith doubts. This teaches them to own their faith for themselves. And one is not likely to throw away what took hard work to develop.
Third, they should also experience and recognize God's hand in their lives through his faithfulness, answered prayer, and meaningful spiritual experiences.

Curiously, also having been teased for their faith is shown to be a faith strengthener, for this actually increases resolve and conviction. It requires they wrestle with the question of whether faith is really worth it.

Strong Faith Begets Strong Faith

Smith summarizes his team's findings in plain and direct language:

"religious outcomes in emerging adulthood are not random happenstance about which all bets are off after age 18. Instead, they often flow quite predictably from formative religious influences that shape a person's life in earlier years. . . . [The] religious commitments, practices, and investments made during childhood and the teenage years by parents and others in families and religious communities, matter---they make a difference." (emphasis added)

And these NSYR conclusions are corroborated by findings from a Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life analysis of religious convictions and practices of America's youth.  Don't listen to the naysayers and pessimists. Their claims are as baseless as they say your child's faith-sustaining prospects are.

My Comments

Our problem is NOT the children raised by pious parents who practice their faith in worship will jettison their faith as quickly as they leave the house.  Our problem in the Church is that there are fewer pious parents who practice their faith.  By practice the faith I mean attend worship 3 out of 4 Sundays, go to Sunday school as adults and take their children to Sunday school, see that their children participate in worship instead of regularly ditching them in the Nursery for babysitting, pray with them each night before bed and each day at meals (minimum), read the Bible to them, regularly include faith in their discussions with their children, and bring their children to catechism class... among other things.

I am NOT trying to paint parents in a bad light and heap scorn and shame on them.  I am only suggesting that a pious and active faith regularly practiced at church, home, etc... is the key.  A once a month or less appearance at church and Sunday school and occasional prayers, etc... do NOT provide the solid foundation on which a child's faith grows and flourishes.  I do understand the stresses placed upon the American family today but I also recognize that many of these are self-inflicted.  Our children learn that faith is not important when sports and leisure activities are acceptable alternatives to the practice of the faith in church and Sunday school.  The noble intentions of parents count little in the way of raising up children in the way of the Lord and passing on a living faith to our children.


View article...


View article...

FW: Lutherans: The Confessing Church

 

Confess…

 

Feed: Steadfast Lutherans
Posted on: Friday, August 09, 2013 7:15 AM
Author: Jim Pierce
Subject: Lutherans: The Confessing Church

 

concordiaLutherans confess their faith in Christ; that is, we actively give reasons for the hope of Christ in us. Evidence of this is clearly seen with the Book of Concord which spans fifty years and displays the profound seriousness Luther and our fathers took in putting clear Biblical expressions of our faith down on paper to be read by all and especially by any who would dare make these expressions their own confession of faith.

Of course, written expressions of what one believes, teaches, and confesses was not something invented by Lutherans. Perhaps the earliest Christian expression of the faith was given by the Apostle Peter and as recorded by Matthew, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Matthew 16:16). Here Peter is repeating back to our Lord what He has already revealed to him. When Peter confesses the truth, he is making it his own. As the Church taught its new converts and encountered errors, or was otherwise put into a position to "make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope" (1 Peter 3:15), it has expressed the true doctrine of Christ in the form of written confessions, or creeds. The Book of Concord is one gigantic creed expressing what the Lutheran confessors describe as without a doubt their teaching and belief. In other words, the Book of Concord is a confession where Lutherans make the teachings expressed in it 'our own.' Read what our confessors say in the Formula of Concord concerning the entirety of our Lutheran symbols:

"Since now, in the sight of God and of all Christendom [the entire Church of Christ], we wish to testify to those now living and those who shall come after us that this declaration herewith presented concerning all the controverted articles aforementioned and explained, and no other, is our faith, doctrine, and confession, in which we are also willing, by God's grace, to appear with intrepid hearts before the judgment-seat of Jesus Christ, and give an account of it; and that we will neither privately nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it, but, by the help of God's grace, intend to abide thereby: therefore, after mature deliberation, we have, in God's fear and with the invocation of His name, attached our signatures with our own hands"[1].

The Lutheran Confessions are not merely a set of condemnations of false doctrines existing at the time of their writing. The Confessions also contain positive statements which are also a true exposition of the Holy Scriptures; they are a solemn declaration of what Lutherans believe, teach and confess is the Christian faith today. Our Lutheran fathers unhesitatingly pronounced in the preface to the Book of Concord,

"Therefore we also have determined not to depart even a finger's breadth either from the subjects themselves, or from the phrases which are found in them, but, the Spirit of the Lord aiding us, to persevere constantly, with the greatest harmony, in this godly agreement, and we intend to examine all controversies according to this true norm and declaration of the pure doctrine"[2].

The confessors could determine "not to depart even a finger's breadth" from our Lutheran confession of faith, because they had set forth their answer to the question repeatedly found in the Small Catechism, "What does this mean?" and the answers given are explicit statements, given under oath, as to what is accepted by all Lutherans as the divine truth found in the Holy Scriptures. Here conditions are not set, these declarations and their acceptance are unconditional. They are either accepted as true expressions of the Holy Scriptures, or they are rejected. To depart from them is to lose the pure doctrine from heaven, Godly unity and harmony.

SMALLCATToday it is not surprising to find some attending Lutheran congregations who have never heard of the Book of Concord. Sadly, the Small Catechism is the only exposure some have with our Lutheran symbols and heritage. It is little wonder why there is so much confusion amongst us as to what it means to be a Lutheran Christian. Indeed, it is this confusion which serves as a breeding ground for false doctrine. Some identifying as Lutheran are comfortable in approving the teachings of Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, and Beth Moore, just to name some of the more popular false teachers exercising influence among Lutherans. I suspect much of this has to do with a common misconception that the laity must only pledge to believe and confess the contents of Luther's Small Catechism and the rest of the doctrines expressed in the Book of Concord are somehow optional. Such a view, however, is misplaced. Luther writes in his short preface to the Large Catechism,

"So a person who does not know this catechism could not be counted as a Christian or be admitted to any Sacrament, just as a mechanic who does not understand the rules and customs of his trade is expelled and considered incapable. Therefore, we must have the young learn well and fluently the parts of the catechism or instruction for children, diligently exercise themselves in them, and keep them busy with these parts"[3].

The Small Catechism is intended to be a brief introduction to a greater arena of life long study in the doctrines of the Church. Luther writes in the longer preface to the Large Catechism,

"Therefore, I again beg all Christians—especially pastors and preachers—not to think of themselves as doctors too soon and imagine that they know everything. (For imagination, like unshrunk cloth, will fall far short of the measure.) Instead, they should daily exercise themselves well in these studies and constantly use them"[4].

meme3Luther begs "all Christians… not to think of themselves as doctors too soon…." We don't want to minimize the standard through which we enjoy understanding of our common confession of faith as Lutherans. Our confessional forbears believed it was necessary to confess each and every article of the faith given to us in the Book of Concord. Pure doctrine is necessary for avoiding errors and confessing such doctrine, as they did, preserves the pure teaching for future generations. If our teachings are not read, taught, and confessed, then they are lost to us and our posterity, being gradually replaced with error. Importantly, too, we lose the unity gained by our agreement, or concord, found in the Lutheran confessions. Or, as stated in the Formula of Concord:

"Since for thorough, permanent unity in the Church it is, above all things, necessary that we have a comprehensive, unanimously approved summary and form wherein is brought together from God's Word the common doctrine, reduced to a brief compass, which the churches that are of the true Christian religion confess, just as the ancient Church always had for this use its fixed symbols"[5].

The Evangelical Lutheran Church is truly a confessing church.

______________________

[End Notes]

1  FC SD XII, 40  http://bookofconcord.org/sd-sects.php#para40

2  Book of Concord on-line http://bookofconcord.org/boc-intro.php#para23

3  McCain, P. T. (Ed.). (2005). Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions (pp. 355–356). St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House.

4 ibid.

5 FC SD, Rule and Norm, 1 http://bookofconcord.org/sd-ruleandnorm.php#para1

 


View article...


View article...

FW: Praying the Catechism

Weedon…

 

Feed: Weedon's Blog
Posted on: Thursday, August 15, 2013 1:24 PM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (William Weedon)
Subject: Praying the Catechism

 

I have a bit of a commute to work (about fifty minutes one way on a good day), and that allows some extra time for prayer. Here is a form of praying the Catechism I've been using lately (I've shared different but similar forms in the past). I thought others might find it useful too:

In the name...

Glory be to the Father (sung, of course!)

You shall have no other gods.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear, love and trust in You above all things; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not use Your name to curse, swear, lie or deceive, but rather call upon it in every trouble, pray, praise and give You thanks; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

Remember the sabbath day by keeping it holy.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not despise preaching and Your Word, but hold it sacred and gladly hear and learn it; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

Honor your father and your mother.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I may not despise or anger my father or other authorities, but honor them, serve and obey them, love and cherish them; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not murder.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I may not hurt or harm my neighbor in his body, but help and support him in every physical need; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not commit adultery.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I lead a chaste and decent life in word and deed, and so love and honor my wife; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not steal.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not take my neighbor's money or possessions or get them in any dishonest way, but help him to improve and protect his possessions and income; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not tell lies about my neighbor, betray him, slander him, or hurt his reputation, but defend him, speak well of him and explain everything in the kindest way; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not covet your neighbor's house.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not scheme to get my neighbor's inheritance and house or get it in a way that only appears right, but help and be of service to him in keeping it; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not covet your neighbor's wife, his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not seek to entice or force away my neighbor's wife, workers, or animals, or turn them against him, but urge them to stay and do their duty; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

He says: I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sins of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, since You threaten to punish all who break Your commandments, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear Your wrath that I may not do anything against them; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

Lord God, since You promise grace and every blessing to all who keep Your commandments, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to love and trust in You and gladly do all that command; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

I pray through the commandments like this four times. Then I pray the Our Father and sing the Gloria in Excelsis. By then, I'm sitting in traffic on the Poplar Street Bridge, waiting to enter St. Louis.


View article...

FW: Order Historic Lectionary Bulletin Covers Now!

 

At last…

 

Feed: Gottesdienst Online
Posted on: Monday, August 12, 2013 9:47 AM
Author: Pr. H. R.
Subject: Order Historic Lectionary Bulletin Covers Now!

 

CPH hath heard our plaintive cry and the new Historic Lectionary bulletin covers are ready to order! They include truly ecclesiastical artwork keyed to the Gospel Lesson for each Sunday and Feast. The new covers will start shipping with Ad Te Levavi in December. You can see all the information as well as sample covers here. I called and the switch over was easy as pie - just dial 800-325-3040 and you'll be done in a snap.

This is a great way to support the Historic Lectionary in our Synod: the more who sign up for the service, the better. And as I've mentioned before: you can't do full color artwork cheaper than this; I've tried and local print shops just can't compete with CPH's prices.

+HRC


View article...


View article...

FW: Liturgy, Neither Alone Nor Neutral

 

Consider…

 

Feed: Steadfast Lutherans
Posted on: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:16 AM
Author: Pastor Matt Richard
Subject: Liturgy, Neither Alone Nor Neutral

 

LITURGY"The liturgy, as a true service, is that which aids both the proclamation of and the hearing of the Gospel for the sake of faith, this is true worship."[1] The liturgy of the Church builds a framework for the worshiper to live the life of faith. The liturgy of the church, as found in the Lutheran Service Book, teaches the full counsel of God because it is based on God's very Word given in the Scriptures. Vilmos Vajita speaks about liturgy the following way,

Rites and ceremonies indeed form a training school of faith. To this extent, the pedagogical view is true to Luther. While ceremonies cannot create the faith, they can point to it. They are the scaffolding needed for building the church, but must not be confused with the church itself. They can serve to bring the immature (the young and simple folk) in the orbit of the Word and Sacrament where faith is born. As long as man is 'external,' such outward orders will be needed for the sake of love, for love and order belong together.[2]

Keep in mind that the liturgy does not simply respond to every blowing wind of culture. Rather, in the formation of the liturgy great care has been taken in choosing its forms, rites, and ceremonies knowing that they either support or hinder true worship.[3]

All of this said, I have found that a common misconception among many American Evangelicals is that practice is often viewed as neutral, thus it is deemed acceptable to separate doctrine and practice. Otherwise stated, I used to hold that the message needed to stay constant while the method (i.e., liturgy) could be flexible.  Methods don't matter and can change if they are neutral, right?  This justification of seeing church practices as being neutral is what leads to the division between doctrine and practice.  The division then allows for the de-emphasis of the practice of the liturgy. However, Klemet Preus in his book, The Fire and the Staff, states,

Doctrine and practice are more closely related, even interdependent, than is often realized. Doctrine affects practice and practice affects doctrine. The two are so intimately woven together that when you change one, you will inevitably change the other, sometimes without realizing what has happened.[4]

Doctrine not only provides knowledge to one's epistemological framework, but practice is also a source of knowledge for one's epistemological framework as well. They are connected. Furthermore, practice is not neutral, it contains theological presuppositions. While embracing different methodologies, for pragmatic reasons, a church can actually allow the theology of heterodox practices to bleed false truths back into the church's core theology. If practices are altered, inevitably the doctrine will be changed. Conversely, if doctrine is altered, practice will also be affected.  Thus, the need for preserving sound practice, as well as sound theology.

What of the times when practice is not changed but instead the liturgy and theology are kept separated (e.g., when doctrinal indifference or doctrinal apathy hollow out the liturgy making the divine service vacuous)? Detrimental results will again follow. Regin Prenter comments on this detrimental effect saying,

If liturgy is separated from theology, i.e., if it is no longer in its essence 'theology' or true witness to the revelation of God, it then becomes an end in itself, a 'good work,' performed with the intention of pleasing God. . . . If, on the other hand, theology is separated from liturgy, i.e., if it is no longer seen as a part of the liturgy of the Church, part of the living sacrifice of our bodies in the service of God and our fellow men, it too, becomes an end in itself, a human wisdom competing with and sometimes even rejecting the revelation of God. . . . These two dangers arising out of the neglect of the essential unity of liturgy and theology are, I think, imminent in our present situation in the Lutheran Church.[5]

So this understanding that practice is in fact, not neutral but rather intertwined with doctrine, is foundational to the preservation of right teaching in our churches. Thus it is most apparent there is a need for preserving sound practice of liturgy, neither separating nor believing the liturgy is neutral. This need is met through liturgical catechesis, as well as through the repetitive, common, and routine use of the Lutheran Service Book.

May the faithful and merciful God fill our hearts with an orthodox practice of liturgy that aids both the proclamation and the hearing of the Gospel for the sake of faith.

————–

[1] Montana District Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, "Theses on Worship," http://www.mtdistlcms.org/president/papers/ (15 June 2013)

[2] Vilmos Vajta, Luther on Worship: An Interpretation (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2004), 175.

[3] AC XXIV, 3 and AP XV, 20.

[4] Klemet Preus. The Fire and the Staff: Lutheran Theology In Practice (St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 2004), 14.

[5] Regin Prenter, "Liturgy and Theology," in Liturgy, Theology, and Music in the Lutheran Church, edited by Mandus A. Egge (Minneapolis, MN: International Choral Union, 1959), 141.


View article...


View article...

FW: The ILC Remembers the First Lutheran Martyrs

 

Hymnody to help you remember…

 

Feed: Witness, Mercy, Life Together.
Posted on: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:19 AM
Author: Al Collver
Subject: The ILC Remembers the First Lutheran Martyrs

 

Vos

In Friday's Matins service participants remembered the life and witness of the first Lutheran Martyrs, Heinrich Voes and Johann Esch. A bit about them follows:

Esch and Voes were Augustinian monks of Saint Augustine's Monastery in Antwerp. When in 1522 all the monks there publicly professed Lutheran doctrine, the Bishop of Cambrai had them all arrested and imprisoned in Vilvorde, where they were interrogated by Jacob van Hoogstraten from Cologne and some dependably Catholic professors. When the monks realized that they risked being burned alive if they did not recant, all except three—Johann Esch, Heinrich Voes, and Lampertus Thorn—recanted. The recanting monks were released but were not returned to the monastery, which instead was declared defiled and soon demolished.

Esch, Voes, and Thorn, still held in custody, were questioned again by the ecclesiastical inquisition court, but they refused to recant. They were then handed over to the secular court and sentenced to death. They were taken to Brussels and held until the appointed day of execution on 1523 July 1. New attempts were made meanwhile to get them to renounce. Voes was brought first to the inquisitors, but he refused to recant. Esch also refused to renounce Lutheranism. Thorn asked for an additional four-day period to study the scriptures with respect to his views, and thus he was not executed then with Esch and Voes. Esch and Voes were summarily delivered to the executioner, brought to the marketplace in Brussels, and burned alive. For some reason, the charges against them were not read aloud as was the established practice; it has been conjectured that the authorities were concerned that hearing the charges might cause Lutheran ideas to spread among the public witnesses or that the ideas were already there and would ignite a protest.

On learning of the execution of Esch and Voes, Martin Luther wrote what is thought to be his first hymn, "Ein neues Lied wir heben an"[4] ("A new song we raise") which was printed in the Erfurt Enchiridion of 1524. This is generally known in English as John C. Messenger's translation by the first line and title "Flung to the Heedless Winds" and sung to tune IBSTONE composed in 1875 by Maria C. Tiddeman or to tune DENBY composed in 1904 by Charles J. Dale).[5]

Luther m 2

A New Song Here Shall Be Begun

"Among Luther's most faithful followers were members of his own order. As early as 1519 Jakob Spreng, the prior of the Augustinian monastery in Antwerp, defended Luther's teachings. In 1521 the Diet of Worms put Luther under the ban, called him a devil in human form, and branded his teaching heretical. In the parts of Germany where Lutheranism was strongest, the terms of this edict were never carried out. Luther's own prince, Frederick the Wise, refused to set his name to it, and, instead of prosecuting Luther, he had him taken into protective custody on the Wartburg.

In the Netherlands, however, political conditions were different. These lands were directly under the emperor. Here the Edict of Worms was carried out to the letter. In Antwerp Jakob Spreng and his successor Henry von Zütphen were arrested and threatened with execution. The remaining Augustinians were undeterred and continued to preach with great success, and so the whole monastery was laid to the ground and all the monks imprisoned. When the scholastics of the famous University of Louvain made it known that the friars would either have to recant or be burned at the stake, all but three renounced Lutheran teaching. The three confessors were convicted of heresy and condemned to death at the stake. The fate of one of them, Lambert Thorn, is not quite clear. He remained in prison and was not executed until 1528. Luther sent him a letter of comfort in 1524. But the other two, Heinrich Voes and Johann Esch, died martyrs' deaths at the market place in Brussels on July 1, 1523, the first blood witnesses of the Reformation.

Naturally, Luther was deeply moved. Instead of pitying these men for the sacrifice which they had been forced to offer, he considered their faithfulness a victory and their martyrdom an honor. But he was incensed by the rumors quickly spread by his enemies who claimed that Heinrich and Johann had with their dying breath disavowed their own teaching and made their "peace with the church." He wanted the blood witness of these two men to be known and the lies of his enemies to be exposed. And so he availed himself of the mass media most commonly used in his day for broadcasting important news. In an age without newspapers, radio, or television, when many people were illiterate, the folk song was the most common form of mass communication. Folk ballads told the stories of kings and villains, of treason and heroism, of battles and banditry. They were printed on broadsheets and widely sold. Wandering minstrels sang them in the market place, the roadside, and the tavern. The ballads quickly made their way from town to town, and soon they were known by heart. Their style was dramatic and direct, their language simple. Often they began with an introductory verse, such as "What shah we now take up and sing?"

Luther was thoroughly familiar with ballads such as these. In his student days he mastered the lute. On the way to the Diet of Worms he entertained the guests at an inn in Frankfurt, singing and accompanying himself on the lute.

It was this role Luther assumed when he wrote the ballad of the two Brussels martyrs, probably early in August, 1523. Beginning with the characteristic folk song phrase, "A new song here has be begun," it became the first hymn of the Reformation. Overnight, as it were, Luther became aware of his gift as a hymnist, and the bulk of his hymns appeared within the next few months. Although Luther wrote no other hymns in the form of a ballad, his martyrs' hymn served as the pattern for countless Anabaptist hymns that appeared in the following years, describing the fate of their martyrs in as many as one hundred stanzas."

Martin Luther, vol. 53, Luther's Works, Vol. 53: Liturgy and Hymns, ed. Jaroslav Jan Pelikan, Hilton C. Oswald and Helmut T. Lehmann (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1999), 211-12.

"A New Song Here Shall Be Begun"

Screen Shot 2013 08 09 at 9 22 02 AM

1 Walter's Wittenberg hymnal of 1524 and most later hymnals have the final cadence lead to the dominant instead of the tonic:

2 The first right fitly John was named,
So rich he in God's favor;
His brother, Henry—one unblamed,
Whose salt lost not its savor.
From this world they are gone away,
The diadem they've gained;
Honest, like God's good children, they
For his word life disdained,
And have become his martyrs.

3 The old arch-fiend did them immure
With terrors did enwrap them.
He bade them God's dear Word abjure,
With cunning he would trap them:
From Louvain many sophists came,
In their curst nets to take them,
By him are gathered to the game:
The Spirit fools doth make them—
They could get nothing by it.

4 Oh! they sang sweet, and they sang sour;
Oh! they tried every double;
The boys they stood firm as a tower,
And mocked the sophists' trouble.
The ancient foe it filled with hate
That he was thus defeated
By two such youngsters—he, so great!
His wrath grew sevenfold heated,
He laid his plans to burn them.

5 Their cloister-garments off they tore,
Took off their consecrations;
All this the boys were ready for,
They said Amen with patience.
To God their Father they gave thanks
That they would soon be rescued
From Satan's scoffs and mumming pranks,
With which, in falsehood masked,
The world he so befooleth.

6 Then gracious God did grant to them
To pass true priesthood's border,
And offer up themselves to him,
And enter Christ's own order,
Unto the world to die outright,
With falsehood made a schism,
And come to heaven all pure and white,
To monkery be the besom,
And leave men's toys behind them.

7 They wrote for them a paper small,
And made them read it over;
The parts they showed them therein all
Which their belief did cover.
Their greatest fault was saying this:
"In God we should trust solely;
For man is always full of lies,
We should distrust him wholly:"
So they must burn to ashes.

8 Two huge great fires they kindled then,
The boys they carried to them;
Great wonder seized on every man,
For with contempt they view them.
To all with joy they yielded quite,
With singing and God-praising;
The sophs had little appetite
For these new things so dazing.
Which God was thus revealing.

9 They now repent the deed of blame,
Would gladly gloze it over;
They dare not glory in their shame,
The facts almost they cover.
In their hearts gnaweth infamy—
They to their friends deplore it;
The Spirit cannot silent be:
Good Abel's blood out-poured
Must still besmear Cain's forehead.

10 Leave off their ashes never will;
Into all lands they scatter;
Stream, hole, ditch, grave—nought keeps them still
With shame the foe they spatter.
Those whom in life with bloody hand
He drove to silence triple,
When dead, he them in every land,
In tongues of every people,
Must hear go gladly singing.

11 But yet their lies they will not leave,
To trim and dress the murther;
The fable false which out they gave,
Shows conscience grinds them further.
God's holy ones, e'en after death,
They still go on belying;
They say that with their latest breath,
The boys, in act of dying,
Repented and recanted.

12 Let them lie on for evermore—
No refuge so is reared;
For us, we thank our God therefore,
His word has reappeared.
Even at the door is summer nigh,
The winter now is ended,
The tender flowers come out and spy;
His hand when once extended
Withdraws not till he's finished.

Martin Luther, vol. 53, Luther's Works, Vol. 53: Liturgy and Hymns, ed. Jaroslav Jan Pelikan, Hilton C. Oswald and Helmut T. Lehmann (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1999), 214-16.


View article...


View article...

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Received for Review

 



Evolution Vs. God: Shaking the Foundations of Faith. Living Waters Publications, 2013. (Review copy provided by New Leaf Publishing Group, www.nlpg.com.) DVD movie. $9.95. (For low-cost bulk copies, call 800-437-1893.) EvolutionVsGod.com  www.livingwaters.com  (LHP)


View article...

Thursday, August 8, 2013

FW: NPR.org - Modern Hymn Writers Aim To Take Back Sunday

 

An interesting, if limited article and interview. Not much is said about those of us who never gave up liturgy and hymnody…

 


Subject: NPR.org - Modern Hymn Writers Aim To Take Back Sunday

 

NPR

Rev. Paul J Cain thought you would be interested in this story

Modern Hymn Writers Aim To Take Back Sunday

 

In recent decades, worship music has trended away from the classic "organ backed" hymns, and churches have moved to rocking praise songs made popular by Christian radio. Now, some modern hymn writers are looking back to a more traditional style.

Read this story

This email was sent by: NPR,1111 N. Capitol St. NE Washington, DC, 20002, United States.


View article...

Monday, August 5, 2013

FW: Upcoming Volumes of Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces

 

!!

 

Feed: Concordia Academic
Posted on: Monday, August 05, 2013 1:01 AM
Author: mayesbtg
Subject: Upcoming Volumes of Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces

 

Johann Gerhard, theologian at Jena

Johann Gerhard, theologian at Jena

2013          On Creation and Predestination

Includes the commonplaces On Creation and Angels, On Providence, On Election and Reprobation, and On the Image of God in Man before the Fall. This volume is notable for its section on the angels and its discussion of many aspects of the doctrine of election.

2014          On Sin and Free Choice

Includes the commonplaces On Original Sin, On Actual Sins, and On Free Choice. This volume is notable in opposing "decision theology," in which one's conversion and salvation depend ultimately on human choice.

2015          On the Law

Includes the commonplaces On the Law of God and On Ceremonial and Forensic Laws.

2016          On the Gospel and Repentance

As the title says, this one includes the commonplaces On the Gospel and On Repentance. This volume is notable for its in-depth examination of confession and absolution, one of the means of grace.

2017          On Justification

Includes just one commonplace, On Justification through Faith—right in time for the quincentennial of the Reformation. (Luther posted his theses for debate on indulgences on Oct. 31, 1517).

Volumes are released every year in the late summer or early fall. Subscribe and save at www.cph.org/gerhard. Become a subscriber to Theological Commonplaces and each new volume of Gerhard's monumental series will be shipped to you automatically. Currently, volumes are priced at $54.99, but as a subscriber you will pay only $38.49, a 30% savings. Your subscription starts with the newest volume and you will continue to receive each new volume. As an added bonus, new subscribers can purchase previously released volumes at the same 30% savings.


View article...


View article...

FW: Upcoming Volumes of Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces

 

!!

 

Feed: Concordia Academic
Posted on: Monday, August 05, 2013 1:01 AM
Author: mayesbtg
Subject: Upcoming Volumes of Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces

 

Johann Gerhard, theologian at Jena

Johann Gerhard, theologian at Jena

2013          On Creation and Predestination

Includes the commonplaces On Creation and Angels, On Providence, On Election and Reprobation, and On the Image of God in Man before the Fall. This volume is notable for its section on the angels and its discussion of many aspects of the doctrine of election.

2014          On Sin and Free Choice

Includes the commonplaces On Original Sin, On Actual Sins, and On Free Choice. This volume is notable in opposing "decision theology," in which one's conversion and salvation depend ultimately on human choice.

2015          On the Law

Includes the commonplaces On the Law of God and On Ceremonial and Forensic Laws.

2016          On the Gospel and Repentance

As the title says, this one includes the commonplaces On the Gospel and On Repentance. This volume is notable for its in-depth examination of confession and absolution, one of the means of grace.

2017          On Justification

Includes just one commonplace, On Justification through Faith—right in time for the quincentennial of the Reformation. (Luther posted his theses for debate on indulgences on Oct. 31, 1517).

Volumes are released every year in the late summer or early fall. Subscribe and save at www.cph.org/gerhard. Become a subscriber to Theological Commonplaces and each new volume of Gerhard's monumental series will be shipped to you automatically. Currently, volumes are priced at $54.99, but as a subscriber you will pay only $38.49, a 30% savings. Your subscription starts with the newest volume and you will continue to receive each new volume. As an added bonus, new subscribers can purchase previously released volumes at the same 30% savings.


View article...


View article...

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Received for Review

 


Gerhard, Johann. Translated by Richard J. Dinda. Edited by Benjamin T. G. Mayes and Joshua J. Hayes. On Creation and Predestination (Theological Commonplaces: XIII-XI). St. Louis: Concordia, 2013. 390 Pages. Cloth. $54.99. https://www.cph.org/p-12928-on-creation-and-predestination-theological-commonplaces.aspx (LHP)

Luther, Martin. Edited by Benjamin T. G. Mayes and James L. Langebartels. Church Postil I (Luther's Works 75). St. Louis: Concordia, 2013. 460 Pages. Cloth. $49.99. https://www.cph.org/p-22560-luthers-works-volume-75-church-postil-i.aspx (LHP)


View article...

Friday, August 2, 2013

FW: Another Look: The Day of Salvation?

 

Consider…

 

Feed: internetmonk.com
Posted on: Thursday, August 01, 2013 10:09 AM
Author: Chaplain Mike
Subject: Another Look: The Day of Salvation?

 

OutdoorRevival

This was first posted in April, 2010.

I remember the day I changed my thinking about when I was "saved."

I had grown up in a mainline Protestant denomination, was baptized and confirmed, attended worship and Sunday School, and dabbled with youth group. However, in my teen years, I was not deeply involved.

Then the big change came.

At the beginning of my senior year in high school, our family moved across the country, an event that precipitated a personal crisis in my life. The foundations were removed from beneath me. For a time, I struggled with depression, drugs and alcohol, loss of meaning, purpose, and direction.

In the midst of my wandering, God graciously brought me into contact with some fellow students who attended a local Baptist church. I saw a real difference in them, and their joy was attractive. I became part of the group, though I hesitated to come forward and confess my faith as a Christian. Eventually, however, I responded to an altar call, went forward and expressed my desire to be baptized as a new follower of Jesus. From that point on, through his gracious preserving power I have never turned back.

For many years, if you had asked me when I "became a Christian," I would have answered, in true revivalist fashion, that the day I "went forward" was "the day of my salvation." That was when I "met Jesus," "got saved," and was "transferred from darkness to light."

Then I met Joe.

KneelCommunionThis was during my seminary days, when I pastored a Bible church in the northern suburbs of Chicago. Joe worked at the college affiliated with our seminary and started attending our church. One day in my Sunday School class he shared his testimony. To my surprise, he said he had attended a United Methodist church in one of the towns where I had lived. He shared how the pastor helped him become a Christian, enter the process of living as Jesus' disciple, and discern God's calling for his life.

The story shook me, because I had attended that church and had sat under that pastor in worship and confirmation classes. After my experience at the Baptist church altar, I had always looked back upon that Methodist church and its minister and considered them "liberal," not faithfully proclaiming the Gospel. Now here was someone giving testimony to how he had met Jesus there!

As I pondered this dissonance between the narrative that Joe spoke and the one that had been running through my head for years, a few memories began to resurface. In particular, I recalled the night before our class was confirmed in front of the congregation. The pastor gathered us in a small chapel and led us in a service to prepare our hearts for the event. To this day, I don't remember a word he said. However, I do recall that he shared a personal story of his own encounter with Jesus and that I was deeply touched. Specifically, what I remember was a sense of great weight and seriousness descending upon me as I participated in that service.

"It will also come to pass that before they call, I will answer" (Isaiah 65:24). It was several more years before I answered the Baptist invitation.

From the day I heard Joe's story, I began to think about my "salvation" differently.

  • Who knows how many times God had gotten my attention, spoken to me, touched me, blessed me, or helped me in the past?
  • Who knows how many times my heart had been impressed and had responded with a form of faith consistent with my age and understanding at that point in my life?
  • In the midst of all my wanderings, who knows how many times I turned in the right direction at the hidden impulse of the Spirit's voice? God had been savingly active in my life long before I answered an altar call.

American revivalism insists that we pinpoint a date, a time, a moment of decision — "the day of your salvation." But is the Bible this reductionistic?

  • Did all the disciples have sudden conversion experiences?
  • Even those believers who did — say Paul — was his a matter of a "personal decision"?
  • What about many of the other extraordinary experiences of Scripture, when God meets a person and changes his or her life in an instant? Are all these stories necessarily about "salvation" being transferred in that moment from darkness to light, from one eternal destiny to another?
  • You may ask, what about the Gospel preaching in the Book of Acts? Though Acts reports many "at the moment" transformational experiences, we must remember that Acts is a book of missions, dealing with first generation Christians, many of whom had no background in Biblical teaching whatsoever. Is their experience meant to be the template for everyone who comes to believe in Jesus?
  • What about all the people of faith who are simply presented to us in Scripture as such, with no reference whatsoever to a moment of decision or conversion (Mary, Simeon, Anna, etc.)?
  • And what do we do with the story of someone like John the Baptizer, of whom it is said he was filled with the Spirit from his mother's womb?

CathedralCeilingRevivalist theology cannot adequately explain the intricacies of God's dealings with us.

The revivalist mindset wants it simple and clear. We want it black and white. We want to know who is in and who is out. We want to mark the sheep and goats now. We want to be able to define, distinguish, and properly deal with the haves and the have-nots. We want it to be as clear as the "I do" of a wedding ceremony. We want to collect the forms and know precisely who has checked the right boxes. We want to have and give assurance of salvation based on something we can see with our own eyes and measure with our own tools. We want to be able to give the clear testimony, "Yesterday I was lost, today I'm found."

For example,

  • The revivalists among us don't like to think that God can work through infant baptism, as the pastor applies the Word of the Gospel mixed with water, to bring that child into his family and begin the process of "by grace through faith" that brings us salvation. (Infant baptism is NOT the focus of this post, so forget about it if you want to make that your issue in the comments!)
  • We can't grasp salvation as something that occurs over time, not in an identifiable "moment," and that its workings may be entirely mysterious to us in terms of specific dates, times, and experiences.
  • We don't like to admit that a person might have several "conversions" over the course of a lifetime, and that we may not always be able to define exactly what each one entails.

One weakness of the revivalist approach is that it separates a person's life into two distinct periods, one "without God" and one "with God". It cannot tolerate nuances in that black/white division. God's work before that "day of salvation" is discounted, especially if "conversion" involves moving from one form of Christian faith to another, as happened with me.

In a post on Jesus Creed, Scot McKnight writes,

Converts develop an anti-rhetoric for their former theology and faith. This anti-rhetoric denounces their old faith and forms into an apologetical defense of their new narrative.

Ask a strong evangelical who was formerly Catholic what Catholics believe and you will often hear something that has little do with what you find in the Catechism or in the official statements. Instead, you will get a powerful rhetoric that caricatures RC theology and beliefs: you will hear terms like superstition, magic and popery. You will get terms about worshiping Mary and idolatry and works salvation. Sometimes this anti-rhetoric is vile. I've heard it hundreds of times. You can try but you will rarely succeed at getting such folks to see the positive gospel within Catholic theology.

With me, it wasn't Catholicism, but my mainline Protestant roots that I rejected as anti-Gospel. Of course, every branch on the Christian tree has its problems, some more serious than others, but I didn't criticize from the standpoint of a theologian. I had developed the "anti-rhetoric" syndrome McKnight describes above. My "conversion" experience led me to denounce the whole of my life before that day as "B.C." (before Christ). It was only upon deeper, more mature reflection later in life that I understood I had never lived a day without God, and that he was savingly active long before I recognized it, had an experience, or made a decision.

This is one reason I identify myself as a "post-evangelical" today. American evangelicalism has its roots sunk deeply into the ethos of revivalism. It's about preaching for decision. And it's the decision that gets it done. In a moment.

In my humble opinion, it is God that gets it done, and his ways are not our ways.


View article...


View article...

FW: Can You Purchase the Entire Collection of “You Can Do It!” Titles? Yes, you can.

 

J

 

Feed: Cyberbrethren Lutheran Blog Feed
Posted on: Thursday, August 01, 2013 9:58 AM
Author: Paul T. McCain
Subject: Can You Purchase the Entire Collection of "You Can Do It!" Titles? Yes, you can.

 

155212

 

You can now purchase the entire set of the YOU CAN DO IT titles, at one time, for a 30% discount. Simply click here and … there you go.

.

.

.

.


View article...


View article...