Tuesday, September 3, 2013

FW: Review and Comment on Into All the World: The Story of Lutheran Foreign Missions

 

Collver…

 

Feed: The ABC3s of Miscellany
Posted on: Sunday, September 01, 2013 4:22 PM
Author: Albert Collver
Subject: Review and Comment on Into All the World: The Story of Lutheran Foreign Missions

 

Review and Comment on Into All the World: The Story of Lutheran Foreign Missions
By Rev. Dr. Albert Collver, Director of Church Relations

 Polack, W. G. Into All the World: The Story of Lutheran Foreign Missions. Saint Louis, Missouri: Concordia Publishing House, 1930.

 Some 36 years after the Missouri Synod engaged into foreign mission work (1894), William Gustave Polack (1890-1950†), a professor of history and liturgics at Concordia Seminary Saint Louis from 1925 to 1950, wrote the story of Lutheran foreign missions. The book apparently was written as a text for mission classes at the seminary. Eighty-three years later the book has value for a couple of reasons. First, the book attempts to address the accusation that Martin Luther, the Reformation, and the Lutheran church were not interested in mission. Second, the book provides a history of Lutheran mission work that is unknown to most contemporary church goers and leaders alike. For those interested in contemporary church relations and ecumenism, the book details the work of 19th century Lutheran mission societies which provided the genesis of churches such as the Lutheran churches in India, Liberia, Madagascar, and Ethiopia. The book also demonstrates that the church in general, and Lutherans in particular, have taken an approach to mission that sends pastors to proclaim the Gospel and to establish seminaries, that establishes schools to educate children, that provides for human care, and that translates important texts beginning with the Scriptures, the Small Catechism, the Book of Concord, selected writings of Luther, and then other helpful Christian literature.

The Introduction defines a missionary as "one who is sent" (pg. 1) and quotes John 20:21, "As My Father hat sent Me, even so send I you." He states that Jesus Christ is the "great Master Missionary," and because of this Jesus sent out apostles to be his missionary. Next to address at this point the unstated criticism that Luther believed the task of proclaiming the Gospel to the nations was completed by the Apostles, Polack writes, "The apostles did a great work, but they did not complete the task. Other Christians who came after them continued the work of teaching and preaching the Word of Salvation." (pg. 1) Polack's point is that the task of proclaiming the gospel is handed down generation to generation.

He concludes the Introduction, "The church of to-day is also engaged in this work, and every Christian bears a part of the responsibility." (pg. 1) In describing the story of Lutheran foreign missions, Polack demonstrates by example how "every Christian bears a part of the responsibility," from the sent missionaries which included pastors proclaiming the Gospel, school teachers bringing Christian instruction to the young, doctors and nurses, agricultural experts, and other workers and laborers who assisted. For those not sent, both pastor and lay, his story shows how they supported the mission work with prayer and financial support. 

The first chapter, titled, "The Biblical Background for Mission-work," and the second chapter, titled, "Survey of Missions from the Days of the Apostles to the Reformation," seeks to provide a brief history of missions before the Reformation. Polack notes that although the missionary work of the Christian church began with Christ and particularly the out pouring of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost, the Old Testament contains a number of passages on the subject. The Old Testament "indicated in various ways the growth and glory of His Church." (pg. 3) After discussing various Old Testament passages, Polack states that the New Testament provides a fuller revelation regarding the missionary idea. The main New Testament passage for mission work in the New Testament is "Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospel to every creation." Polack notes that the "Great Commission" appears five times in the New Testament but "not always in the same form and in the same connections and relations." (pg. 7) He concludes "no one can read the New Testament without being impressed by the fact that missions are a most vital factor in Christianity and that the men most closely associated with our Lord during His earthly ministry were thoroughly awake to this fact." (pg. 11)

In the second chapter, Polack recounts the missionary activity of the Apostles. He also indicates where tradition said the various Apostles brought the Gospel to the world. Saint Paul crosses the sea bringing the Gospel to Asia Minor, Cyprus, Macedonia and finally to Rome. John to Asia Minor. Matthew to Ethiopia. Peter to Palestine and Babylon. Thaddeus went to Armenia and Persia; Andrew beyond the Black Sea; Philip to Scythia and Phrygia (modern Turkey); Bartholomew to Arabia. Thomas went to India. The Gospel went to the entire world known to the Apostles. Over the next 200 years in the post-apostolic period, Christians were persecuted and the blood of the martyrs were the seed of the Church. Polack highlights key individuals who were missionaries to the pagans such as Ulfilas, Martin of Tours, Patrick, Columba the Elder, Augustine of Canterbury, Boniface, Ansgar, and Cyril and Methodius. Polack notes, "Thus the Church of Christ was spread during these centuries into all parts of Europe ... By the end of the Middle Ages all of Europe had been brought within the pale of the Christian Church, but the Church itself had become seriously corrupted." (pg. 25) As Christianity advanced in the North, in the South where it had once flourished it was overtaken by Islam. The Middle Ages drew to a close, with the discovering of the New World and new opportunities for mission work.

In chapter three, Polack treats "The Age of the Reformation." At the beginning of the chapter, Polack notes that of the past four hundred years of Lutheran history, "the last one to two hundred years of the history of the Christian Church have been years of exceptional missionary activity." (pg. 34) In the 500 years since the Reformation, the church has had the opportunity to proclaim the Gospel over a larger geographical area and to more people than at any other time. The church has had more converts over the past 500 years than during the previous 1,500 years of the church's history before the Reformation. The church also has had more martyrs. More Christians were killed for their faith in the 20th century than in the previous nineteen centuries of the church's history. It is estimated that there were 45 million martyrs during the 20th century. In other words, a Christian is martyred every five minutes — making Christians the most persecuted group of people on earth. The new missionary age also has brought about a new period of martyrdom.

Polack begins his discussion about "The Age of the Reformation" by stating, "The Reformation restored to the Church the Gospel in its purity and in all its fulness." (pg. 34) It is of great significance that the Reformation restored the Gospel, for without knowing the pure Gospel, without have the message and doctrine to preach, in the worst case there is no mission activity and in the best case, it is hindered. People frequently take for granted that the church possess the pure Gospel and do not realize the challenge in keeping the purity of the Gospel. Mission work involves two aspects summarized succinctly by former Missouri Synod President Alvin Barry, "Get the Message Straight! Get the Message Out!"

The contemporary era seems to have emphasized one over the other at various time, usually at the expense of getting the message straight. Polack correctly notes the major aspect of the Reformation was "getting the message straight" and would encourage the reader not to underestimate the importance of that. In fact, the movement of the church from one region of the world to another region is in part caused by a lack of thankfulness by people for the Lord's Word proclaimed in truth and purity. In formerly Christian lands, such as North Africa, Europe, and perhaps the United States are caused in part by a lack of thankfulness and a lack of concern about keeping the message straight.

Even in 1930, the Lutherans in general and the Missouri Synod in particular faced the accusation that Reformation was not interested in mission. Polack quotes Dr. Gustav Warneck's monumental work History of Protestant Missions: "Notwithstanding the era of discovery in which the origin of the Protestant Church fell, there was no missionary action on her part in the age of the Reformation." This accusation against Martin Luther and the Reformation is oft repeated in missiology books throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. These accusations continue to be leveled against the Lutheran church both by people outside the Lutheran church and by those within who have been influenced by these missiology thinkers. Behind these charges are assumptions both about the definition of mission and the church. If "mission" is defined as "Go into the world," then Luther and the Reformation were not missional. If "mission" is defined according to the verb in Matthew 28:19 as "make disciples" wherever you are at by baptizing and by teaching, then Luther and the Reformation were among the greatest missionaries in the history of the church. Most contemporary works on missions define being missional as "going" someplace, even though this is not the verb used by Jesus in the "Great Commission."

As to the charge the Reformation and Luther did not "Go" into the world, Polack notes that it is based on "insufficient knowledge of history" and "on false judgment of the circumstances." (pg. 36) One aspect of the accusation involves Dr. Martin Luther's understanding the preaching of the apostles "has gone out into all the world, though it has not yet come into all the world." (pg. 37) In one sense, Dr. Luther believed that Jesus' command to proclaim the Gospel to the world was fulfilled by the preaching activity of the Apostles. At the same time, Luther "recognized the duty of Gospel-preaching and that it is obligatory upon every age of the Church." (pg. 37) Luther's view is consistent with the doctrinal position that all prophecy and commands of Christ are fulfilled so that he can return in glory at any moment. At any moment from the time of the Apostles until the present, Christ could return in His glory. The gospel has gone out into the world and any delay in His return is related to his gracious will to allow more time for the Gospel to be proclaimed.

Another aspect of the accusation that the Reformation and Luther were not interested in missions revolves around the historical circumstances of the Holy Roman Empire (that is, the German lands at the time of the Reformation). The German people did not possess a navy or ships, as the predominately Roman Catholic countries of Spain and Portugal. It would be two more centuries before sea travel became relatively common place for the rest of the world. (Not unlike the present age when people can travel in relative ease around the world on jumbo jets.) Part of the so-called lack of interest among Lutherans to take the Gospel to the world was simply the inability to do so. Polack notes, "A further reason why the Evangelicals in the Reformation Age did not carry the Gospel to the heathen in foreign fields was the fact that these were inaccessible to them. Throughout the sixteenth century foreign commerce and shipping, colonization and conquest, were under the exclusive control of the servants of Rome." (pg. 41)

Polack addresses these charges and points out: "Most of the critics of Luther hold that by missions we must think only of the evangelization of the heathen who have not the Gospel, of foreign missions in our modern acceptation of the term. That, however, is not correct, and our Church has never defined missions in this restrictive sense... we can truly say that the entire Lutheran Reformation was a missionary movement. It brought the Gospel to thousands who had had little or nothing of the saving Light before. In fact, Luther and his disciples were fairly submerged in the mightiest missionary undertaking since the days of the apostles." (pgs. 38 - 39) He concludes, "the dissemination of Gospel-truth into all corners of Europe, beginning at Wittenberg and going out into all parts of the Continent and the British Isles, was itself one of the greatest missionary movements in history ... When Luther gave back to the world the Bible, the source of all true faith and Christian service, he laid the foundation for all the Protestant missionary movements that came after him." (pgs. 42 - 43)

One of the single biggest hinderances to mission was the establishment of the State Church and the rise of rationalism. By definition, the State Church is concerned with the people within the State, not outside the State. The resources given to the State Church are to be used within her territorial boundaries. Polack notes, "no Protestant state church has made foreign missions, from the beginning, the concern of the Church as such." (pg. 81) Polack observed, "Only in a number of free churches, especially in America, are missions the affair of the Church as such. We may call this one of the evils of state-churchism." (pg. 81) All of the Lutheran churches, and most of the other Protestant churches were state churches and as such the State did not have an interest in investing resources in foreign missions. Because Rome was not beholden to any one State (in fact, the States were beholden to Rome in many cases), mission work flourished in the New World under the direction of the Roman Catholic church. 

By the end of the eighteenth century, pious Lutherans and other pious Protestants who heard the call of Jesus to make disciples of all nations formed mission societies. Polack notes, "But as the State, of which the Church in Germany was a part, does not provide funds for missionary work, this necessitated the formation of voluntary societies in order to turn the new interest and zeal into practical execution." (pg. 82) Bible and mission societies came into existence and were funded by individuals rather than by the State. Both pastors and lay people were members of the mission societies. Some of the mission societies established missionary seminaries or houses of study. Several mission societies founded in the nineteenth century continue to exist and function today. Although many mission societies were unionistic in nature, some intended to be distinctly Lutheran. For instance, the Leipzig Mission Society desired: 1) to carry on the work of missions in the spirit of the Lutheran Church; 2) to give the missionaries a thorough course of instruction; 3) to adapt the preaching to the needs of the people; 4) and to leave the heathen unmolested in customs not in conflict with the Word of God. (pgs. 95 - 96) The Hermannsburg Mission Society desired, "all the Lutheran symbols and especially the beautiful Lutheran liturgy to be recognized and used by mission-churches as well as by churches in the fatherland." (pg. 97) The mission societies carried out the mission work in foreign lands that the State Churches were unwilling to do.

The history of the mission societies had a significant effect on the Missouri Synod. Some of the pastors who later joined the Missouri Synod were initially sent by mission societies in Germany. Additionally, the Missouri Synod's Constitution did not allow members of the Synod (pastors, teachers, and congregations) to cooperate and work with "heterodox tract and mission societies." In fact, the Missouri Synod was founded with the intention of doing missions as a church rather than through mission societies. Polack writes, "At the organization of the Missouri Synod in 1847 Foreign Mission effort was designated as one of its objectives, but the extensive Home Mission work to which the Synod was called to give immediate attention made it impossible to begin missionary operations in non-Christian countries. Nevertheless a mission among the American Indians in Northern Michigan was carried on." (pg. 124) Polack also notes that the Synodical Conference was formed in 1872 with the intention of carrying out foreign missions between the cooperating Synods.

In Chapter Nine, Polack treats, "The Foreign Missions of the Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States." As noted above, the Missouri Synod was founded with the intention of doing foreign missions. In 1893 the Missouri Synod resolved to begin mission work in Japan, however, these plans did not materialize and the Synod began work in India. On October 14, 1894, the first foreign missionaries, Theodore Naether and Franz Mohn, for the Missouri Synod were commissioned to serve in India. These men had been affiliated with the Leipzig Mission Society but they found it necessary to depart for reasons of conscience. The Leipzig Mission Society was not remaining distinctly Lutheran so these men sought out the Missouri Synod.

Polack outlines the methodology used by the Missouri Synod in foreign mission. "Evangelization by missionary preaching tours was one of the chief methods of making Christ known to the people." (pg. 130) "Christian day-schools are considered to be equal in importance to evangelization." (pg. 131) "It is the policy of the mission to employ only Lutheran teachers." (pg. 145) Medical work was begun. "Divine services are conducted regularly at all stations and outstations." (pg. 131) Orphanages were established. A seminary was built. The elements of Missouri Synod mission, while not always called Witness, Mercy, Life Together, nevertheless followed this pattern.

Polack concludes his book: "Thousands and thousands of heathen have heard the Gospel-message, and many, far more than we know, have been won by it for life eternal. May God help us to realize this thankfully, and may the blessing of God inspire us at home and aboard to still greater self-sacrificial and consecrated service! For the love of our Savior and of the whole redeemed human race let us labor while it is day." (pg. 156) Indeed, let us labor while it is day.

Into All the World: The Story of Lutheran Foreign Mission is a forgotten book that still tells a helpful story. A story that corrects some misperceptions some people still hold today regarding how the Reformation and Lutherans view mission. The book helps us see that mission is at its heart the sharing of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which happens every Sunday in the local congregation, in various settings as Christians share the hope that they have, and aboard on the foreign mission field. The basic elements of mission have not changed: proclaim the Gospel (Witness), show mercy and charity to those in need (Mercy), hold divine services and build schools and seminaries (Life Together). Polack also helps to show how Lutheran and Protestant mission emerged out the State Church by using mission societies. He also shows how the Missouri Synod sought to be different by being a church engaged in mission rather than carrying out this task through "tract and mission societies." The history of the first Lutheran mission efforts are as inspiring today as they were then. The book is a quick and easy read. Well worth the time for those interested in mission and the history of missions.

 Download or Read Into All the World: The Story of Lutheran Foreign Mission below:
 


View article...


View article...

FW: Dorothy Sayers, Christian Apologist

 

Sayers…

 

Feed: Steadfast Lutherans
Posted on: Friday, August 30, 2013 8:15 AM
Author: Pastor Sam Schuldheisz
Subject: Dorothy Sayers, Christian Apologist

 

Christianity is an historical religion. Not just in the sense of having a long history, which it does. But Christianity is also historical in this manner: the central event – the one thing that makes Christianity what it is – is an historical event, namely, the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. To be sure, other world religions have history, that is, in the former manner of speaking . But they lack the same quality of historical integrity, verifiability, veracity, and most of all, falsifiability.

I usually ask skeptics and Christians alike this same question: "are there any facts, which if they were proven to be true, would cause you to give up your faith?" I've heard the skeptic and the Christian both answer with an adamant and definitive, "NO!" You see the problem here, don't you? Both answers have removed the subject of inquiry from the field of knowledge, facts and history, something the Christian ought never to do. Paul says if Christ is not dead, then our faith is in vain and futile and we are still in our sins (1 Cor. 15:1ff). In other words, show the body and it's all over; eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow we die.

Pontius-Pilate-InscripBut in fact, Christ has been raised. And this didn't happen once upon a time, in a galaxy far, far away, or in never-never land. But in history. In time and space. Somewhere between the years 30-33 AD (depending on which crucifixion dating you go with). It's CSI Jerusalem! There were eyewitnesses. They saw him dead on a Friday. Saw where he was buried. Knew the tomb. Went to the tomb on Sunday. Saw him alive again. Touched him. Heard him. Saw him (1 John 1:1-4). Ate fish with him. And not just once, but many times. And he was seen by over 500 witnesses. There are codices. Manuscripts by the thousands. Even the stones cry out. We confess that Christianity is historic and factual on a weekly basis. He was crucified under Pontius Pilate. No other world religion is able to make these kinds of claims to historical investigation. It's as if Paul is saying, "Go ahead; put Christianity on trial. Just the facts. There's more than enough there for a verdict."

 

Christianity and history are intricately woven together. Makes sense. As we confess, "He was made man." The author of history appeared on the page. The playwright became the lead role in the greatest drama ever staged, as Sayers calls it. And she's right.For the greatest drama ever staged also happens to be the one myth that became fact. It is the greatest true story, but it does not for that reason lose the drama or the beauty of a good story. It is the best story precisely because it is true. It is concrete, tangible, and historical in every sense of the word. Sure enough there are myths of dying gods in many mythologies. However, to compare these to Christianity is like comparing The Simpsons to a reputable nightly news program. Here's what Dorothy the apologist has to say about all this.

 

Christianity is, of course, not the only religion that has found the best explanation of human life in the idea of an incarnation and suffering god. The Egyptian Osiris died and rose again; Aeschylus in his play, The Eumenides, reconciled man to God by the theory of a suffering Zeus. But in most theologies, the god is supposed to have suffered and died in some remote and mythical period of prehistory. The Christian story, on the other hand, starts of briskly in St. Matthew's account with a place and a date: "when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the King." St. Luke, still more practically and prosaically, pins the thing down by a reference to a piece of government finance. God, he says, was made man in the year when Caesar Augustus was taking a census in connection with a scheme of taxation. Similarly, we might date an event by saying that it took place in the year that Great Britain went off the gold standard. About thirty-three years later (we are informed), God was executed, for being a a political nuisance, "under Pontius Pilate" – much as we might say, "when Mr. Johnson-Hicks was Home Secretary." It is as definite and concrete as all that.

 

Dorothy Sayers, The Greatest Drama Ever Staged, Letters to a Diminished Church. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2004, p. 2-3.

 


View article...


View article...

FW: Those Lutheran-Sounding Anglicans

 

Consider…

 

Feed: Strange Herring
Posted on: Saturday, August 31, 2013 9:19 PM
Author: Anthony Sacramone
Subject: Those Lutheran-Sounding Anglicans

 

9479760_0_Img2

 

Well, I must say that I didn't expect my post to find the audience it did, for which I am certainly grateful. RealClearReligion, TitusOneNine, First Things's First Thoughts, and Cranach all linked to it. Gene Veith, writer of the last named, in the context of his post, mentioned the Mockingbird blog, which reminded me of one name I had intended but failed to discuss: Paul F. M. Zahl.

Zahl is a retired rector of The Episcopal Church and the author of such winsome books as Grace in Practice, Five Women of the Reformation, The Protestant Face of Anglicanism, and A Short Systematic Theology. He was also dean of Trinity School for Ministry in Ambridge, Pennsylvania, probably the premier seminary for evangelical Anglicans in America. He is also the father of David Zahl, the editor in chief of the Mockingbird blog.

Paul Zahl's full-throated advocacy for the simul justus et peculator construal of the Christian's status before God, and relentless and unapologetic apology for unbounded grace in both our life before God and with our neighbor has elicited accusations of virtual antinomianism—a charge often hurled at Lutherans.

I must say I have been quite taken over the years by Zahl's vigorous assault on all manner of magical thinking in the Christian life—objectifications of the divine that promise more than they can deliver. And while he can certainly sound Lutheran in his strict separation of law and gospel, his beliefs about the church and the sacraments can only leave a confessional Lutheran (even a not-so-confessional Lutheran) flabbergasted. While Anglicans certainly have their low-church wing, if Zahl were any lower, he'd be preaching in China.

Before you can do justice to Zahl's "no ecclesiology is an ecclesiology," however, you have to understand how important the practical, the everyday, theology as lived, is to him.

From Grace in Practice:

Ecclesiology is unimportant for two reasons. The first reason is positive. The other themes of Christianity are infinitely more important than the "church idea." No one has ever awakened in the middle of the night anxious about ecclesiology per se. You may wake up worried about your child or upset about someone said to you during the day. But you never wake up worried about the church. . . . Ecclesiology is therefore unimportant because other things are more important, such as the saving inherent in the Christian drama and the poignancy of life in relation to loss.

Ecclesiology is also unimportant for a negative reason. Ecclesiology is an actual ill! By definition it places the human church in some kind of special zone—somehow distinct from real life—that appears to be worthy of study and attention. The underlying idea is that the church is in a zone that is free, or at least more free, from original sin and total depravity from the rest of the world., but the facts prove otherwise. . . .

To say we have no ecclesiology is not just a negation. To have no ecclesiology is to have an ecclesiology. What sort of ecclesiology is this? It is a noble one. It puts first things first. It puts Christ over the human church. It puts what Christ taught and said over the church. It puts grace over the church. It puts Christ's saving work and the acute drama of the human predicament over the church. . . .

. . . The problem with the church as institution, humanly and historically understood, is that it almost always seeks to confine and control the word from the cross, which is the word of grace and one-way love. The human church cannot help itself. . . . The church, being in no sector free from original sin, clings closely to sin and exercises will. This is the will to law, which becomes the will to power. In almost every moment of historical time, the church has come down on grace. It has been fearful of it, competitive with it, and hostile to it. Church is typically the enemy of grace. . . .

While the conflict between a systematic theology of applied grace, on the one hand, and the notion of a settled ecclesiology, on the other, results in a radical negation of the church idea, this should not scandalize us. It is the essence of Protestant believe in demystifying and deconstructing the human church. This book is only a contemporary expression of an enduring if intermittent plea within the history of Christianity: grace trumps church every time.

Needless to say, in Zahl's deconstruction enterprise, sacraments cannot be part of the "saving work of Christ," vehicles of grace, and church discipline is only the church, once again, stifling grace. Whatever Jesus meant by "my church" in Matthew 16:18, Zahl has reduced to a merely human institution with every human flaw.

Because the church as Christ's body cannot mean for Zahl what it has meant for many Christians throughout history (an understanding he calls a misunderstanding, à la Emil Brunner), Zahl also construes Christ's real presence as a real absence. Christ, like Joltin' Joe, has left and gone away. He is not present in the Eucharist. He is not present in the keys to bind and loose given to the church. He is not present in the preached Word. So where is he?

"The presence of Christ's absence is found within the works of love."

Al Kimel, a former Episcopalian, a former RomanCatholic, presently Eastern Orthodox, wrote about Zahl's theology several years ago. Kimel admitted to something of a Lutheran phase, as well as Zahl's influence on his thinking, at least for a while. In 2005, Kimel, then a Catholic, revisited Zahl's Short Systematic Theology and approached it as a Lutheran might.

Consider:

God may have become flesh in Jesus Christ two thousand years ago, but where is he now? He is "present in his absence," Dr. Zahl tells us. Now there are perfectly orthodox ways to construe this assertion. Clearly Jesus is not present among us in the same way that he was bodily present to his disciples two thousand years ago. Clearly his ascension does bring us an experience of absence, despite our Lord's promise to be present with us to the end of the age. If we have a Lutheran inclination, we might want to interpret Christ's absence through a theology of the cross. "He deserves to be called a theologian," Martin Luther tells us in his Heidelberg Disputation, "who comprehends the visible and manifest things of God seen through suffering and the cross." For Luther the hiddenness of God is grounded, not in the deity's metaphysical difference from his creation, but in the creator's free decision to hide himself in the world he has made—and most particularly in those events and objects that sinners find most humiliating and inglorious. God confronts sinners in their pride and self-righteousness by revealing himself in weakness and suffering, in those things that are opposite to himself (sub contrario).

But Zahl takes Luther's theology of the cross in a direction that Luther would have repudiated and indeed did repudiate. Zahl rejects the objectification of the risen Christ in the life of the Church. He rejects the essential sacramentality of the gospel and insists that since his ascension Christ is only known in his "non-tangible presence."

While human beings stand alone in terms of the divine accompaniment of the absent risen Christ, they are surrounded at the same time by the magnificent intangibility of the risen Christ. Because he is nowhere in particular, he is everywhere in general. To quote the Prayer Book collect, "we are forever walking in His gift." Moreover, the generality of his presence is not a reversion to the phenomenon that "all cats are grey in the dark." For he is present in the compassionate love of human beings, which mirrors his love for us when he was on earth. His abstraction always becomes concrete in the particular love that is grace. (p. 39)

We also understand Jesus to have existed in continuity with the risen Christ. But he is no longer present in the tangible world. He is present neither in sacrament, nor in the words of the Bible, nor in the visual image, nor within his present potential presence arising from the future hope. He is present, rather and only, in the works of love, in the fruit from the belovedness that the gospel story engenders when it grasps us. (p. 49)

All Christians will agree with Dean Zahl that the risen Christ is powerfully present in the event of sacrificial love; but I am almost tempted to say, so what? How does that touch my life? How do I enter into that love? How do I unite myself to my Savior? How am I filled with the Spirit? It is true that every actualization of love, every victory of good over evil, every triumph over injustice and wickedness is a manifestation of the risen Christ. But as Luther might ask, Where is Christ for me?

I'm sure Zahl has an answer, although how consonant it is with confessional Protestant thought, whether of the Canterbury, Geneva, or Wittenberg variety, is another thing. Keep in mind also that one of the influences on his Short Systematic was Ernst Käsemann, a signal force in the "Second Quest" search for the "historical Jesus," a bankrupt enterprise that has succeeded in uncovering precious little about Jesus but a lot about how bored scholars manage to organize so many conferences.

In short, Zahl's body of work is certainly no bridge between Wittenberg and Canterbury (and, it should be stated, never claimed to be), offering mostly a long laundry list of what the historic church has gotten wrong. Such an approach doesn't provide much of a foundation for a unified, orthodox "classical" Anglican—it's simply too eccentric. It's Zahlism more than Anglicanism.

Nevertheless, Zahl is a sharp writer who offers much ammunition against contemporary theologies of glory and continues to shed light on the culture's self-justifying and self-righteous pathologies—no small things.

Takeaway from Grace in Practice:

A theology of everyday life depends on the un-free will. If the will is free, then we do not need someone to save us. We may need a helper, but we do not need a savior. . . .

. . . Often when the subject of the un-free will comes up, people jump ahead of my claim. They think I am talking about predestination. They think I mean Pavlov and little dogs with bells and shocks. They think I am trying to corner them into some kind of idea that makes people in to puppets. To this I say, "You're ahead of the game. I am talking about one thing, and one thing only: how people actually act and whether they are under compulsion in certain situations. Please don't talk to me about puppets until you have answered me about addicts."

. . . Human beings are not as free to act as they like to think they are. They are more hemmed in, more constrained by outward circumstance and forces within, than they wish to concede. We all want to do what we want to do. The fact is, we often do what we do not want to do, and do not do what we want to do. I am not the first person to have said this.

That the human will is born un-free is one of the plainest facts of the human world. It is also the most hidden. It is plain because it is plain from experience. It is hidden, in plain sight, because no one wishes to see it. . . .

This can sound to some as if it were an attack on human dignity. It is not an attack. Rather, it is the birth pangs of compassion.

Now that'll preach. Even among Lutherans.


Filed under: The Anglican Way, Wittenberg


View article...


View article...

FW: An Interview with Healy Willan

 

Watch…

 

Feed: Gottesdienst Online
Posted on: Friday, August 30, 2013 7:22 AM
Author: Rev. Larry Beane
Subject: An Interview with Healy Willan

 



Thank you to my father-in-law Martin Fonda for recording this on VHS and sending it to me. I was finally able to convert it and load it up on YouTube.


View article...


View article...

FW: Why Christians Need Confessions

 

We believe, teach, and confess…

 

Feed: Cyberbrethren Lutheran Blog Feed
Posted on: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 8:33 AM
Author: Paul T. McCain
Subject: Why Christians Need Confessions

 

nicene-creed

 

I bumped into this pithy little explanation of why Christians need formal confessions of faith, via a comment Jack Kilcrease made on Facebook. I thought it was spot-on and well put. I particularly like the turn of phrase in point 4: "relativize the present." The present seems, to us, to be the ultimate moment of human existence, doesn't it? It is good to understand ourselves to be but mere players on the greater stage of human history, and one among many of God's people passing through the time that He gives to us and this created universe.

1) Confessions delimit church power.  …This is what stops churches from becoming cults: clear and open statements about where church authority begins and ends, connected to transparent processes of exercising that authority.

2)  Confessions offer succinct summaries of the faith.  The church with a good confession and a good catechism has a ready-made pedagogical tool for instilling the truth into its people.

3) Confessions highlight that which is of importance.  A good, elaborate confession provides the church…with a fine resource for teaching the people about what really matters and why.

4) Confessions relativize the present and connect us to the past.  …The use of creeds and confessions is one intentional means of connecting ourselves to the past, of identifying with the church of previous ages, and thereby of relativizing our own significance in the grand scheme of things.

5) Confessions fulfill a vital part of Paul's plan for the post-apostolic church.  …Without a 'form of sound words,' [the church] would drift from her theological moorings, losing touch with her past and with other congregations in the present.  A 'form of sound words,' a confession, [is] crucial for maintaining both continuity with the apostles and unity among the Christians in the present.

 

[Speaking of "Confessions" … don't miss the sale on Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions, combine with other copies, or other items from the sale, and you can qualify for free shipping.}

 

HT: Reformed Reader via Jack Kilcrease comment on Facebook.


View article...


View article...

FW: Talking about Talking

 

Peters…

 

Feed: Pastoral Meanderings
Posted on: Sunday, September 01, 2013 5:00 AM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Peters)
Subject: Talking about Talking

 

The pace of change in the Church is glacially slow.  This is frustrating to many and a source of great consternation to those within and without.  I am regularly among those who alternate between a complaint at how slow things are moving for the changes I want made and how relieved I am when the pace of change is slow for those things I do not want to change.  Many have given up on the process and believe the Church is stymied from growth because it is slow to change.  I wonder if the reason the Church remains to exist is due to this very deliberate pace of change.

Often before substantial measures may be dealt with, the whole process begins simply with the invitation to begin a conversation.  In other words, we begin by talking about talking.  You may laugh but talking about talking is not a small step.  When the old Synodical Conference fell apart, both the WELS and ELS said that they would keep talking to Missouri but that conversation never really took place until recently.  None of us believes that the old unity once enjoyed by the Synodical Conference will be quickly or easily recovered – and not primarily because of the reticence of Missouri.

Years of distance, fear, and suspicion have made it hard for all sides to know where to begin.  So we begin simply with a conversation about conversing.  Talk is not cheap.  Sometimes it costs us not only the effort to form the words but the rekindling of a desire to listen as well as speak.

Think how division becomes institutionalized in families where hurt, suspicion, mistrust, and distance keep those related by blood from living together as a family.  So this happens in the same way on a larger scale for church bodies.  If we can understand how this happens within the human family, we can imagine how difficult it is to get congregations and synods to begin to talk to one another and to listen to each other.

Right now Missouri is talking about talking with WELS and the ELS, and, it might be said, with many others throughout the world -- including those with whom we have no prospect of any foreseeable future fellowship.   These include Anglicans as well as Lutherans of various persuasions -- and that surely includes those who have left the ELCA.  This is a good thing.  It may not bring immediate or significant result but it is not itself an insignificant or small thing.  Some wonder why we would talk without a prospect of future fellowship but I suggest to you that these are entirely the right conversations at the right time.  Talking about talking is a good and realistic first step.  We pray the Lord to bring fruit to these tentative conversations begun with folks near and far, those who know our Confession and those who are just finding out what confessional Lutherans believe, confess and teach.  I would also suggest that this may be descriptive of our conversations with Rome -- talking about talking and finding out what it is that share, how it is that we disagree, and what it is that we can do together acting fully with integrity on both sides.


View article...


View article...

FW: The Changing Face of World Mission

 

More Peters…

 

Feed: Pastoral Meanderings
Posted on: Saturday, August 31, 2013 5:00 AM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Peters)
Subject: The Changing Face of World Mission

 

In the old days, mission work was almost as colonial as the politics of the developed nations toward the "third" world.  The folks sharing the Gospel were also those who ran the mission church and they came as strangers to the culture and community in which they served.  I say this not to impugn their motives or their great results but to frame the perspective on mission that once dominated the Church.

Today it is much more likely that the missionaries train the indigenous leaders who will themselves personally bring the Gospel to their communities around the world.  In fact, the last few years have been particularly fruitful for the Missouri Synod in this regard.  Our newest and most fruitful relationships with other church bodies have come not from dialogs toward altar and pulpit fellowship but from invitations from churches to come and help them train their Pastors and church leaders that they may do the work of the kingdom in their midst.

In Missouri we call this the Global Seminary Initiative.  This has born many fruits not in the least of which is the new friendship between the Ethiopian Evangelical Church Mekane Yesus.   It may or may not result in altar and pulpit fellowship but it will intertwine our futures in a significant way.  In other cases, this has resulted in altar and pulpit fellowship (the Siberian Lutheran Church).

Few would deny our LCMS expertise in the areas of seminary education and training.  Our history of education (on all levels – elementary, secondary, and collegiate) leaves us uniquely situation to provide these services to those seeking them.  In this way we have the opportunity to broadly expand our reach and influence for the cause of confessional Lutheranism.  Now is the time for us to fund this endeavor more fully so that its fruits may be born here and there.  Right now the whole global initiative has a $1.2 million dollar budget – smaller than many of our medium and large congregations and schools at home.

At the July Synod convention, the LCMS approved this direction but it will not flourish until we in the congregations and as Lutheran individuals get behind it.  This is not checkbook evangelism but providing the resources for a fruitful and influential process by which the cause of truth and orthodoxy within Lutheranism may be fostered.

At my own Mid-South District Convention we cemented our partnership with the Lutheran Church in Tanzania (Southeast of Lake Victoria Diocese) by providing funds so that their Pastors could make their way to one of our seminaries and receive further training.  Though individual congregations (like mine) will continue to partner in brick and mortar work, the long term future will be sealed less by money than by sharing a common faith and confessing together what it is we believe, confess, and teach.  The more we can bring Pastors to our seminaries and strengthen not only the educational background but foster the personal relationship, the better the ecumenical future for both sides of this equation.

I would merely observe that where the LCMS was once the lonely and solitary path have found us suddenly on the cutting edge of the ecumenical endeavor – not because we abandoned our confessional integrity but precisely because of it!  Now this is a place Missouri has seldom found itself and it is a good place to be.  I hope and pray we do not fail to resource this opportunity so that the Lord may bring to harvest the seeds that are sown by this mission effort!


View article...


View article...

FW: Explaining baptism to non-Lutherans

 

Share…

 

Feed: theology like a child
Posted on: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 6:03 AM
Author: infanttheology
Subject: Explaining baptism to non-Lutherans

 

Baptism_DeadToSin_0005_Group-1-e1321461157261

 

Pastor Jason Harris, commenting on the Gospel Coalition blog, on how God uses chosen means to save:

Interesting discussion. I haven't dealt a lot with this stuff since I was a Lutheran, then Baptist, then Calvinist, then Lutheran in High School. Nonetheless I occasionally get bible study questions about how to explain Baptism to Protestants.

The easiest and most natural point of contact is "the word of God". Lutherans and Baptists alike get all warm and fuzzy about that idea. But it helps to unpack one's self-understanding of the phrase.

Is the Word functionally information upon which the will reacts positively or is it a, for lack of a better term, supernatural "God force"? When one says one has heard the word and "gotten saved", does that mean that God himself has actually done a miracle or that salvation resides in the natural ability of Joe Atheist to logically process data in such a way that he makes himself Joe Christian.

In other words, is the "Gospel" the power of God or a logical proposition? All sinners, both Baptist sinners and Lutheran sinners, prefer to take credit on their own account and comfort in their own actions. It is just as wrong to take pride in the fact that you put money in the plate, got the kids out of bed every Sunday or got baptized as a work earning salvation as it is to teach recitation of magical prayers or obedience to a certain impressive degree of "progressed" sanctification as a criterion for paradise.

All Christians, both Lutheran Christians and Baptist Christians, brought to faith by the miraculous working of the Holy Spirit through the means of Grace and thinking in accordance with the new inner man, will recognize that any and everything related to their salvation is entirely the work of God.

They would also agree that God works in mysterious ways. "Was lost but now I'm found, was blind but now I see." How that happened to such a dirty rotten jerk like me is a "God thing". Yet conservative Christians, both conservative Lutheran Christians and conservative Baptist Christians, recognize that God is not an abstract force that hovers around mountains tops, in the blowing breeze and smiles of children.

He condescends and veils himself in simple physical tangible elements, most notably in the incarnation of the Logos. Jesus, the Word made flesh, is in the business of miraculously making dead things alive. He doesn't do this with advanced philosophical rhetoric, but through common every-day stuff. He spit in mud and smeared in on people's eyes. He stuck his fingers in people's ears. He washed their feet, because if he didn't they would have no part of him.

For the sake of simplicity, ignore Baptism and communion for a moment and focus on "the Word". When Pastor Bob drops a tract in the truck stop bathroom or preaches a sermon that gets you saved, what made that happen? Was it the paper on which the tract was printed? Was it the ink? Was it Bob? Was it your own reason? Was it the cool new Bose sound system? No. It was God. God's strong Word, Jesus himself, was cleaving the darkness, doing miracles, declaring light to be called out of darkness, killing the old man and causing those dry bones to rattle together and form ligaments and tendons.

Did this occur in a lightning bolt from heaven? No it came though means of ink, paper, vocal cords, Bose sound systems, ear-drums, neurological synapses, perhaps even a splash of toilet water from the loo in the truck stop bathroom that soaked in and highlighted a particular verse. Nonetheless God used the common everyday elements working with common every people to do extraordinary things.

Does ink save you? No
Does paper save you? No
Does water save you? No

But God DOES save you though these things when he connects his Word, Jesus himself, to them.

http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2013/01/22/what-about-those-lutherans/?comments#comment-60656

Image from: http://blogsbylutherans.uaclutheran.com/author/philip-hoppe/



View article...


View article...

FW: Worship Conference with Hymn Festival

 

Texas…

 

Feed: Steadfast Lutherans
Posted on: Sunday, September 01, 2013 8:15 AM
Author: Norm Fisher
Subject: Worship Conference with Hymn Festival

 

This announcement was added to the Lutheran Calendar provided by BJS. Periodically we make a post of an event to remind people that the calendar exists and how to use it. Click here for information on how to add your event to the Calendar. This Calendar shows up on the sidebar here as well as various other sites around the web, including the Wittenberg Trail. Add the Lutheran Calendar to your website by adding a RSS feed to your widget area with the URL http://feeds.feedburner.com/BJScalendar

 

Pastor Luther:  His Music and His Care of the Soul

St. Paul will be hosting a Worship Conference on October 6-8 with a Hymn Festival on Monday evening at 7pm, the 7th.  Plenary presenters will be Dr. Carl Fickenscher and Kantor Kevin Hildebrand who will also serve as the Hymn Festival organist.

This conference is devoted to teaching practical skills to pastors, to musicians (full and part-time) and interested laypeople as they explore ways to apply the rich treasures of Lutheran hymnody and theology in the local congregation.  Some of the sessions are highly theological, others more practical, but all are meant to help pastors appreciate better the role of music in the proclamation of the Word and to help musicians think critically about their ministry.  In addition to opportunities for worship and a hymn festival, the conference is designed to inspire church leaders with ideas they can apply in their home parish as they work to proclaim the Gospel through Word and Sacrament.

Click here for the schedule and descriptions of plenary and sectional sessions.

Click here for more information about presenters.

Click here to download a registration form to mail.

Click here to register and pay online.

 

For more information contact
St. Paul Lutheran Church
3501 Red River Street   Austin, Texas 78705
Kathy Achterberg, Minister of Music
music@stpaulaustin.org
512.472.8301


View article...


View article...

FW: Don’ts & Dos

 

Consider…

 

Feed: Intrepid Lutherans
Posted on: Monday, September 02, 2013 6:00 AM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Spencer)
Subject: Don'ts & Dos

 

Don'ts & Dos for the Orthodox Lutheran Pastor

 

Thoughts from Thunder Mountain

["Huachuca" - A Chiricahua Apache word meaning "thunder."]


 > Don't assume any other Pastor is orthodox just because you roomed with him in prep or college, or he's married to your sister, or related in any way.

 

    Do always "test the spirits" with regard to all other Pastors, near and far.

 

 

> Don't expect your members to be 100% orthodox Lutherans.

 

    Do expect and demand that your fellow ministers be 100% orthodox Lutherans.

 

 

> Don't judge your ministry by numbers – any numbers.

 

    Do evaluate your ministry according to your faithfulness to the Lutheran Confessions and historic Christianity.

 

>Don't get into a spitting-match with a skunk – you'll lose every time.

 

    Do stand up and speak out for the truth in every forum.

 

 

> Don't try to save the church – leave that to God.

 

    Do inform your congregation, and your fellow Pastors, as to the dangers and problems you see.

 

 

> Don't ever resign without a VERY good reason. 

 

    Do take your congregation with you if you leave your church body, otherwise they may be left to "wolves."

 

> Don't expect your church body to always remain orthodox.

 

    Do understand that ALL church bodies become heterodox eventually, and always be prepared to act accordingly, and as your conscience directs.

 

> Don't ever stop studying, learning, and growing in your faith and knowledge of the Bible and Book of Concord. 

 

    Do keep up with what's going on among other Lutherans and other Christians.

 

 

> Don't use your congregation as guinea pigs for your liturgical innovations.

 

    Do educate your congregation about historic liturgical practices before you institute them - but DO institute them, don't just talk about it.

 

 

> Don't let your congregational or personal ministry records become out-of-date.

 

    Do always be prepared to leave your congregation at any time with all things in good order.

 

  

 

Pastor Spencer

 

[from vacation on the beach near San Diego]


View article...


View article...

FW: LCMS News

 

The LCMS app…

 

From: LCMS e-News [mailto:LCMSENEWS@lcms.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 12:58 PM
Subject: LCMS News

 

 

The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod September 3, 2013 • No. 84

New on Reporter Online


To read this new story, click on the headline below or visit Reporter Online at http://reporter.lcms.org.

 


Reporter Online is the Web version of Reporter, the official newspaper of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. If you have questions or comments about this LCMS News release, contact Joe Isenhower Jr. at joe.isenhower@lcms.org or 314-996-1231, or Paula Schlueter Ross at paula.ross@lcms.org or 314-996-1230.


This edition of LCMS News is provided by LCMS Communications

Site Map | Privacy Policy | myLCMS

The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
All Rights Reserved.


View article...