Monday, August 19, 2013

FW: In Christ Alone...

 

Consider…

 

Feed: Pastoral Meanderings
Posted on: Saturday, August 17, 2013 5:00 AM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Peters)
Subject: In Christ Alone...

 

There's no definition for what's a hymn and not a praise song. But Keith Getty says it should be singable without a band and easy for anyone sitting in the pews to pick up. And it should say something bold.  "I think it's to the church's poverty that the average worship song now has so few words, so little truth," he says. "[It] is so focused on several commercial aspects of God, like the fact that he loves our praises."  Kristyn Getty says that some of the most popular music doesn't show God the proper reverence.  "There is an unhelpful, casual sense that comes with some of the more contemporary music," she says. "It's not how I would talk to God."

In case you missed it, Keith Getty is the responsible for what is rapidly becoming one of the most popular contemporary songs used in worship -- In Christ Alone"  --  and Kristyn Getty (his wife) is more often than not the voice that introduces these new worship songs to the congregation.

No less a medium attuned to the national pulse than NPR picked up and delivered this story.  You can read it all here.  The point of this that the popular style of contemporary worship music, with its emphasis on rhythm and sound and its characteristic 7 word lyric is meeting a challenge in the praise band and praise song congregational setting.  You might expect it to come from "traditional" worship advocates but, in this case, the words of warning about the theological vacuity and the shallowness of a musical form that relies on sound rather than text has come from one of the most prominent writers of contemporary worship music.



While I am no fan of contemporary praise music, I have to admit that the content of this song is certainly meatier than most of the genre.  I can only hope that this is the start of a revolution away from spectator church music in which the focus is on the performer(s) and from the typical trite, shallow, and casual nature of contemporary praise music designed for people to actually sing.  But... I have been disappointed before...


View article...


View article...

FW: Commemoration of Johann Gerhard, Theologian

 

Gerhard…

 

Feed: Cyberbrethren Lutheran Blog Feed
Posted on: Saturday, August 17, 2013 5:15 AM
Author: Paul T. McCain
Subject: Commemoration of Johann Gerhard, Theologian

 

gerhardtOn August 17 we commemorate the great seventeenth Lutheran theologian, Johann [John] Gerhard. What a remarkably gifted servant of Christ this man was. Following in the tradition of Martin Luther and Martin Chemnitz, after these two, clearly Gerhard is the most influential Lutheran theologian from the great "golden age" of Lutheran orthodoxy, that period of time marked basically by most of the 17th century. His magnum opus is clearly his Loci Theologici, but he was most widely known in his own lifetime as the author of numerous deeply devotional works of vibrant Lutheran piety. It was not until the late 1900s and into this present century that Gerhard's devotional works became known to a new generation of Lutheran Christians. Ironically, in fact, many younger Lutherans may have heard of John Gerhard's dogmatic works, but they came to know Gerhard first through his devotional writings, such as Sacred Meditations and Daily Exercise of Piety

Gerhard was born in Quedlinburg, Germany and at the age of fifteen came down with a life-threatening sickness. This experience, along with guidance from his pastor Johann Arndt, was the turning point in his life. He devoted the rest of his life to theology. He became a professor of theology at the University of Jena, long the bastion of authentic Lutheranism in the years following Luther's death. He also served as the "Superintendent" of the consistory of Heldburg, a position which was effectively that of a bishop to the congregations, and clergy and other church workers in the territory.

Gerhard's literary output remains unsurpassed to this day, in terms of both its breadth and depth. A colleague remarked that what has always struck him most when reading Gerhard's Loci Theologici [Theological Topics], is Gerhard's command of a vast array of sources: first, Scripture, then the Confessions, Church Fathers, followed by all manner of works of linguistic scholarship and the writings of his Roman Catholic and Reformed opponents. His sermons were collected over the years and these two now have become accessible to English speakers.

There are a number of his popular devotional works and sermon collections in English, they include:

An Explanation of the Sunday and Festival Gospel Lessons: Part I Sermons that address the first half of the church year – Advent through the Feast of Pentecost. Translated from the first part of Postilla, das ist, Erklaerung der Sonntaeglichen und Fuhrnehmsten Fest-Evangelien das gantze Jahr (1613).

Comprehensive Explanation of Baptism and the Lord's Supper: Begun the same year he started work on his renowned dogmatics, the Loci Theologi, Johann Gerhard's Ausƒürliche schmriƒtmäßige Erklärung, is a masterpiece in its own right. In 67 chapters (31 for Baptism and 36 for the Lord's Supper).

Meditations on Divine Mercy: This book is a translation of Gerhard's Exercitium Pietatis Quotidianum, a book of 45 prayers that Gerhard wrote prior to 1612. Now newly translated from the German, Meditations on Divine Mercy is available for English readers to enjoy and appreciate. A chapter on the purpose and benefits of prayer is also included as well as an explanation of the aspects of daily meditation.  Exercitium Pietatis Quotidianum

Sacred Meditations. This was the most popular of Gerhard's devotional works. These 51 meditations by Gerhard are among the most profound devotional material ever produced within the Church, leading the reader through most of the articles of Christian doctrine.

This largest work, the Loci Theologici, was translated by Richard Dinda through the 1960s-1990s, and was purchased by Concordia Publishing House in 2002. It is being thoroughly edited and revised by Dr. Benjamin Mayes. The Theological Commonplaces series is the first-ever English translation of Johann Gerhard's monumental Loci Theologici. Gerhard was the premier Lutheran theologian of the early seventeenth century. Combining his profound understanding of evangelical Lutheran theology with a broad interest in ethics and culture, he produced significant works on biblical, doctrinal, pastoral, and devotional theology. Gerhard interacts with the writings of the church fathers, Luther and his contemporaries, and the Catholic and Calvinist theologians of his day. His Loci are regarded as the standard compendium of Lutheran orthodoxy, with topics ranging from the proper understanding and interpretation of Scripture to eschatology.

Useful for research on Lutheran doctrine, Gerhard's accessible style makes this a must-have on the bookshelf of pastors and professional church workers.

Here is a longer biographical sketch of Gerhard, from Studium Excitare.

Johann Gerhard (1583-1637)

Johann Gerhard lived during a time when the Lutheran Church was in great need of discipline and an orthodox leader. Our gracious God lovingly provided for these needs of his Church through this man. "Gerhard is the third (Luther, Chemnitz, Gerhard) in that series of Lutheran theologians in which there is no fourth" (Gerhard,9).

Johann Gerhard was born in Quedlinburg, Upper Saxony, on Wednesday, October 17, 1582. His parents, Bartholomaeus and Margareta, took him to be baptized on the following Sunday.

His early education began at the public school in Quedlinburg, where he learned literature from three faithful and suitable teachers until 1598. During his attendance there, he composed a Gospel history in Latin verse. At age 15, he contracted consumption and dropsy, and for a whole year he was tormented by sickness and temptation. He wrote a prayer book for himself, which he often drenched with his own tears. The pastor in Quedlinburg, Johann Arndt, comforted and consoled him, and it was due to his influence that Gerhard vowed to study theology, if God should ever permit him to recover. God did provide him a recovery.

A horrible epidemic ran through Quedlinburg in 1598, affecting 3,300 people. The disease also took hold of Gerhard very fiercely, so that he thought he might die. His mother detected the disease immediately and gave him a dose of the only antidote available. She then immediately summoned a physician who, unaware of the dose Johann's mother had given him, gave him another dose. In just a few hours, he was well again (Fisher,22).

In 1599, he spent a semester of school in Halberstadt, where he wrote a Passion history in Greek verse, before enrolling at the University of Wittenberg. He began to study philosophy at Wittenberg, and he attended two lecture courses in theology later in the year. From 1600 to 1601, he applied himself to medical science, and even began to practice medicine and give prescriptions. He headed to the academy at Jena in February, 1603, where his conscience reminded him of his former vow. He took up a curriculum in theology and philosophy. He also started reading the Scriptures and the church fathers day and night, praying ardently beforehand and afterwards. His studying paid off, and he received his master's degree in philosophy in June of the same year.

During Christmas of that year, he became very ill and thought he surely was going to die. On December 29 he wrote his will, which also contained a beautiful, orthodox confession of faith in all essential points of doctrine. However, God was not finished with him yet, and he recovered three weeks later.

He went to the university of Marburg in May, 1604, to further advance his theological education. In addition to attending three lecture classes (Genesis, Person of Christ and Justification, Proverbs), he also started two classes of his own, one in philosophy and the other in theology. On August 10, 1605, he left Marburg as a result of the uprising and controversy that was taking place there.

Duke Johann Kasimir of Coburg called Gerhard to be the bishop of Heldburg in 1606. Gerhard accepted the call, provided that he would be able to finish his doctorate at Jena first. The duke consented to this. As part of this pursuit, Gerhard gave a dissertation on Ephesians 4 in July, which 300 students attended. On August 15, he gave his inaugural discourse on the Lord's Supper, and three days later he underwent a rigorous examination. The theological faculty at Jena made him a doctor of theology on November 11.

He fulfilled his office of bishop at Heldburg faithfully, not only preserving the truths of Scripture in his own teaching, but also making visits to churches in Thuringia and Franconia to examine what was being taught and to exercise discipline if necessary. During this time he also held weekly disputations at Duke Kasimir's univesity preparatory school in Coburg. In 1615, Kasimir "called" Gerhard ("forced" might be closer to reality) to be Coburg's pastor and superintendant-general. The duke was very possessive of Gerhard. He refused to release him even when Gerhard expressed his desire to accept a call extended to him by the academy at Jena in 1611.

Kasimir finally dismissed Gerhard at the end of April, 1616, but only after the academy at Jena had repeated the call through the Elector of Saxony. So Gerhard went to the academy at Jena to be a professor of theology. He had longed for an academic profession, and the academy had long desired that he teach there. He arrived there in May, where he was cordially greeted by the faculty. From 1616 to the end of his life, he taught quite a variety of courses in dogmatics and exegesis. For instance, in 1631 Gerhard taught a course on theological topics, a course on his own book Loci Theologici (more on that later), exegetical courses on 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, and Philippians, and a Bible class on the Gospel of John. He loved the academy for its reputation and sound doctrine, and although he received many other calls, even to the prestigious university at Upsala, Sweden, he remained at Jena until he died. Many men became outstanding Lutheran pastors and professors under his guidance.

When Gerhard was 27 years old, he had married Barbara Neumeier, who was two months shy of 14 years old at the time. Although she was quite young, she was known for her charm, beauty, and devotion to the Lord. When she was 16, she bore Johann a son, Johann Georg, who died 17 days later. From that time on, she became sick and caught a horrible fever. On May 30, 1611, she uttered her last words, "Come, Lord Jesus" (Fischer,217), and died. Her death wounded her husband deeply.

Three years later, Gerhard remarried, this time Maria Mattenberg. They were devoted to each other as long as they were married. She bore him 10 children, three of whom died just days after they were born. Their names were, in order, Georg Sigismund, Margaret, Elisabeth, Johann Ernst, Johann, Maria, Polycarp, Johann Friedrich, Johann Andreas, and Anna Christina (Fischer,221-222).

Gerhard suffered many hardships throughout his life. At various times he suffered asthma, rheumatism, dry fever, a thin voice (especially before his call to Jena), kidney trouble, and weakness of his entire body and its functions. Death constantly surrounded him and everyone living in those days. His father had died when he was 16 years old. The Thirty Years War (1618-1648) raged during a large part of his life. During this war, Gerhard was under threat of imprisonment several times. Once he and his colleague, Johann Major, went out to the city gates of Jena to dissuade Count Tilly from destroying the entire city. When the count covered his ears, "Gerhard ran off to the side and shouted excitedly: 'I don't want you to listen to me now; I want you to listen to God!'" (Fischer,95). In this way he did affect the count, and the city suffered only minor pillaging.

In spite of all this, Gerhard was well known for his godliness, piety, kindness, agreeableness, gentleness, sobriety, thankfulness, humility, patience, generosity, imagination, and steadfastness in unfavorable situations. He was devoted to his family; after his children reached their teens, he held devotions with his family twice a day, every day (Fischer,129). He gave immensely of his time, talents, and treasures for the benefit of the Church; he acquired two estates for the academy by his favor with the nobility. His religious enemies could find no blemishes on him with which to accuse him or ruin his reputation. That which he wrote was in harmony with the life that he lived. Even when Gerhard wrote against Calvinists, Papists, and Photinians, while he thorougly denounced their errors, it could hardly be said that he had written harshly (Fischer,121). (This could not be easily said of Lutheran theologians before him.)

He was a prolific writer. "His colleague Johann Himmel said of him that he had written many excellent works in his life, his hand moving as fast as his thoughts, without ever revising any book once written" (Scharlemann,42). His greatest work by far was his Loci Theologici (Topics of Theology) in nine volumes, which took him 11 years to write. In it he outlined and explained comprehensively all points of Scriptural doctrine, together with extensively detailed refutations of error. His most popular work by far was his Meditationes Sacrae (Sacred Meditations), which he wrote at age 22. Since its first publication in Latin, it has been translated into almost every major language. Some of his other excellent works include Harmoniae evangelicae Chemnitio-Lyserianae continuatio (A Continuation of the Gospel Harmony by Chemnitz and Leyser), Confessio catholica (The Universal Confession), Exercitium pietatis quotidianum (The Daily Exercise of Piety), Die Passions-Historie nach den vier Evangelisten (The History of the Passion According to the Four Evangelists), and Von der heiligen Taufe und dem heiligen Abendmahl (Concerning Baptism and the Lord's Supper). Some of these have been recently published in English by Repristination Press.

Gerhard's writings, while certainly not infallible, attest to the outstanding knowledge and wisdom with which the Lord endowed him. His enemies were forced to remain silent while he was alive, due to the thoroughness he employed in refuting them from Scripture. He was certainly an unsurpassed benefit to the academy at Jena at that time and through his writings is still very beneficial today to the Christian Church as a whole.

On August 12, 1637, Gerhard contracted an inner burning and weakness of his bodily powers. On August 15, with his colleagues Johann Major and Johann Himmel at his side, he committed his children to the Lord in prayer. Thereafter he confessed his faith, and asserted that he still held firm to the holy doctrine he had always taught. Following this, he named three theologians who would be worthy of succeeding him. Then he extended his hand to the two great theologians by his side, who wept greatly at this gesture. After bidding them farewell, he confessed his sins and received the Lord's Supper from his pastor, Adrian Beier, archdeacon of Jena. For the next two days, he spoke very little and slept much. On August 17, "his eyesight began to fail, his hearing weakened, and his breathing became heavy. Johann Gerhard, therefore, in the presence of his two colleagues, John Mayor (Johann Major) and John (Johann) Himmel, of Master Adrian Beyer (Beier) and very many of his friends, amid their very ardent prayers … gave up his life around three in the afternoon with these words: 'Come, come, Lord, come'" (Fischer,290).

His funeral took place on August 20. His body was taken to St. Michael's church, where this epitaph, written by Ludwig Fidler, was imposed upon him: "Here lies Godliness, Uprightness, Frankness and John (Johann) Gerhard. Such praise befits him, and that is enough" (Fischer,290).

We do well to praise and thank our Lord for the people he has used in the past to preserve and strengthen his church. He certainly does not need humans to help him in this task, but he has nevertheless bestowed upon many people that high privilege and responsibility. Johann Gerhard was certainly not among the least of these.

Bibliography
  • Fischer, Erdmann Rudolph. The Life of John Gerhard. Richard Dinda and Elmer Hohle, 2000. (Published: Malone, TX: Repristination Press, 2001.)
  • Scharlemann, Robert P. Thomas Aquinas and John Gerhard. New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1964.
  • Gerhard, Johann. Sacred Meditations. (Printed: Malone, TX: Repristination Press, 2000.)


View article...


View article...

FW: Commemoration of Bernard of Clairvaux, Theologian and Hymnwriter

 

St. Bernard…

 

Feed: Cyberbrethren Lutheran Blog Feed
Posted on: Monday, August 19, 2013 5:37 AM
Author: Paul T. McCain
Subject: Commemoration of Bernard of Clairvaux, Theologian and Hymnwriter

 

bernard11

Today we commemorate and thank God for His faithful servant, Bernard of Clairvaux [1090-1153]. Bernard has always been a particular favorite Medieval church father of mine, and apparently, I'm in good company, since he is spoken highly of by many of our own Lutheran fathers. He is cited favorably at least five times in the Book of Concord, and is frequently cited favorably by Dr. Luther. He had a depth of expression and a deep love for Christ expressed in a warm, living, piety that touched many in his own life and countless others since He is perhaps most widely known as the writer of several famous hymns: O Jesus, King Most Wonderful and O Sacred Head, Now Wounded. In the second issue of Dr. CFW Walther's newspaper, The Lutheran, he printed this short piece about Bernard:

"St. Bernard, the famous abbot of Clairvaux, who died in 1153, is a noteworthy example how the most pious and the best of those in the papacy, when they came into great trials, rejected all of their trust in their own human holiness, in their own works and service, and in the intercession of the saints in heaven, and took sole comfort in the all sufficient service of JESUS Christ for their salvation. Even though in his life Bernard had most strictly pursued holiness and had ascribed such a high value to his position as a monk that he considered it as if it were another baptism (Apolog. Ad Builielm. Abb.), he nevertheless confessed when he suddenly cried out for his salvation because of a severe trial: "I confess that I am not worthy of myself nor can I receive heaven through my own service. But my LORD JESUS Christ has a double right to heaven; first because he is by nature its heir, and then because he has earned it through his meritorious suffering. That first right he has for himself, the second he gives me. Through this gift heaven is mine by rights, so I cannot be lost."

In the extended entry of this post, you can read a biographical sketch of Bernard.

Born: 1090
Birthplace: Fontaine-les-Dijon, Burgundy, France
Died: 20-Aug-1153
Location of death: Clairvaux, Champagne, France
Cause of death: unspecified

Gender: Male
Religion: Roman Catholic
Race or Ethnicity: White
Occupation: Religion

Nationality: France
Executive summary: Reformed the Cistercian Order

St. Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux one of the most illustrious preachers and monks of the middle ages, was born at Fontaines, near Dijon, in France. His father, a knight named Tecelin, perished on crusade; and his mother Aleth, a daughter of the noble house of Mon-Bar, and a woman distinguished for her piety, died while Bernard was yet a boy. The lad was constitutionally unfitted for the career of arms, and his own disposition, as well as his mother's early influence, directed him to the church. His desire to enter a monastery was opposed by his relations, who sent him to study at Châlons in order to qualify for high ecclesiastical preferment. Bernard's resolution to become a monk was not, however, shaken, and when he at last definitely decided to join the community which Robert of Molesmes had founded at Citeaux in 1198, he carried with him his brothers and many of his relations and friends. The little community of reformed Benedictines, which was to produce so profound an influence on Western monachism and had seemed on the point of extinction for lack of novices, gained a sudden new life through this accession of some thirty young men of the best families of the neighborhood. Others followed their example; and the community grew so rapidly that it was soon able to send off offshoots. One of these daughter monasteries, Clairvaux, was founded in 1115, in a wild valley branching from that of the Aube, on land given by Count Hugh of Troyes, and of this Bernard was appointed abbot.

By the new constitution of the Cistercians Clairvaux became the chief monastery of the five branches into which the order was divided under the supreme direction of the abbot of Citeaux. Though nominally subject to Citeaux, however, Clairvaux soon became the most important Cistercian house, owing to the fame and influence of Bernard. His saintly character, his self-mortification — of so severe a character that his friend, William of Champeaux, bishop of Châlons, thought it right to remonstrate with him — and above all, his marvellous power as a preacher, soon made him famous, and drew crowds of pilgrims to Clairvaux. His miracles were noised abroad, and sick folk were brought from near and far to be healed by his touch. Before long the abbot, who had intended to devote his life to the work of his monastery, was drawn into the affairs of the great world. When in 1124 Pope Honorius II mounted the chair of St. Peter, Bernard was already reckoned among the greatest of French churchmen; he now shared in the most important ecclesiastical discussions, and papal legates sought his counsel. Thus in 1128 he was invited by Cardinal Matthew of Albano to the synod of Troyes, where he was instrumental in obtaining the recognition of the new order of Knights Templars, the rules of which he is said to have drawn up; and in the following year, at the synod of Châlons-sur-Marne, he ended the crisis arising out of certain charges brought against Henry, Bishop of Verdun, by persuading the bishop to resign. The European importance of Bernard, however, began with the death of Pope Honorius II (1130) and the disputed election that followed. In the synod convoked by Louis the Fat at Étampes in April 1130 Bernard successfully asserted the claims of Pope Innocent II against those of Anacletus II, and from this moment became the most influential supporter of his cause. He threw himself into the contest with characteristic ardor. While Rome itself was held by Anacletus, France, England, Spain and Germany declared for Innocent, who, though banished from Rome, was — in Bernard's phrase — "accepted by the world." The pope travelled from place to place, with the powerful abbot of Clairvaux at his side; he stayed at Clairvaux itself, humble still, so far as its buildings were concerned; and he went with Bernard to parley with the emperor Lothair III at Liége.

In 1133, the year of the emperor's first expedition to Rome, Bernard was in Italy persuading the Genoese to make peace with the men of Pisa, since the pope had need of both. He accompanied Innocent to Rome, successfully resisting the proposal to reopen negotiations with Anacletus, who held the castle of Sant' Angelo and, with the support of Roger of Sicily, was too strong to be subdued by force. Lothair, though crowned by Innocent in St. Peter's, could do nothing to establish him in the Holy See so long as his own power was sapped by his quarrel with the house of Hohenstaufen. Again Bernard came to the rescue; in the spring of 1135 he was at Bamberg successfully persuading Frederick of Hohenstaufen to submit to the emperor. In June he was back in Italy, taking a leading part in the council of Pisa, by which Anacletus was excommunicated. In northern Italy the effect of his personality and of his preaching was immense; Milan itself, of all the Lombard cities most jealous of the imperial claims, surrendered to his eloquence, submitted to Lothair and to Innocent, and tried to force Bernard against his will into the vacant see of St. Ambrose. In 1137, the year of Lothair's last journey to Rome, Bernard was back in Italy again; at Monte Cassino, setting the affairs of the monastery in order, at Salerno, trying in vain to induce Roger of Sicily to declare against Anacletus, in Rome itself, agitating with success against the antipope. Anacletus died on the 25th of January 1138; on the 13th of March the cardinal Gregory was elected his successor, assuming the name of Victor. Bernard's crowning triumph in the long contest was the abdication of the new antipope, the result of his personal influence. The schism of the church was healed, and the abbot of Clairvaux was free to return to the peace of his monastery.

Clairvaux itself had meanwhile (1135-36) been transformed outwardly — in spite of the reluctance of Bernard, who preferred the rough simplicity of the original buildings — into a more suitable seat for an influence that overshadowed that of Rome itself. How great this influence was is shown by the outcome of Bernard's contest with Peter Abelard. In intellectual and dialectical power the abbot was no match for the great schoolman; yet at Sens in 1141 Abelard feared to face him, and when he appealed to Rome Bernard's word was enough to secure his condemnation.

One result of Bernard's fame was the marvellous growth of the Cistercian order. Between 1130 and 1145 no less than ninety-three monasteries in connection with Clairvaux were either founded or affiliated from other rules, three being established in England and one in Ireland. In 1145 a Cistercian monk, once a member of the community of Clairvaux — another Bernard, abbot of Aquae Silviae near Rome, was elected pope as Eugenius III. This was a triumph for the order; to the world it was a triumph for Bernard, who complained that all who had suits to press at Rome applied to him, as though he himself had mounted the chair of St. Peter.

Having healed the schism within the church, Bernard was next called upon to attack the enemy without. Languedoc especially had become a hotbed of heresy, and at this time the preaching of Henry of Lausanne was drawing thousands from the orthodox faith. In June 1145, at the invitation of Cardinal Alberic of Ostia, Bernard travelled in the south, and by his preaching did something to stem the flood of heresy for a while. Far more important, however, was his activity in the following year, when, in obedience to the pope's command, he preached a crusade. The effect of his eloquence was extraordinary. At the great meeting at Vezelay, on the 21st of March, as the result of his sermon, Louis VII of France and his queen, Eleanor of Guienne, took the cross, together with a host of all classes, so numerous that the stock of crosses was soon exhausted; Bernard next travelled through northern France, Flanders and the Rhine provinces, everywhere rousing the wildest enthusiasm; and at Spires on Christmas Day he succeeded in persuading Conrad, king of the Romans, to join the crusade.

The lamentable outcome of the movement was a hard blow to Bernard, who found it difficult to understand this manifestation of the hidden counsels of God, but ascribed it to the sins of the crusaders. The news of the disasters to the crusading host first reached Bernard at Clairvaux, where Pope Eugenius, driven from Rome by the revolution associated with the name of Arnold of Brescia, was his guest. Bernard had in March and April 1148 accompanied the pope to the council of Reims, where he led the attack on certain propositions of the scholastic theologian Gilbert de la Porrée. From whatever cause — whether the growing jealousy of the cardinals, or the loss of prestige owing to the rumored failure of the crusade, the success of which he had so confidently predicted — Bernard's influence, hitherto so ruinous to those suspected of heterodoxy, on this occasion failed of its full effect. On the news of the full extent of the disaster that had overtaken the crusaders, an effort was made to retrieve it by organizing another expedition. At the invitation of Suger, abbot of St. Denis, now the virtual ruler of France, Bernard attended the meeting of Chartres convened for this purpose, where he himself was elected to conduct the new crusade, the choice being confirmed by the pope. He was saved from this task, for which he was physically and constitutionally unfit, by the intervention of the Cistercian abbots, who forbade him to undertake it.

Bernard was now ageing, broken by his austerities and by ceaseless work, and saddened by the loss of several of his early friends. But his intellectual energy remained undimmed. He continued to take an active interest in ecclesiastical affairs, and his last work, the De Consideratione, shows no sign of failing power. He died on the 20th of August 1153.

The greatness of St. Bernard lay not in the qualities of his intellect, but of his character. Intellectually he was the child of his age, inferior to those subtle minds whom the world, fired by his contagious zeal, conspired to crush. Morally he was their superior; and in this moral superiority lay the secret of his power. The age recognized in him the embodiment of its ideal: that of medieval monasticism at its highest development. The world had no meaning for him save as a place of banishment and trial, in which men are but "strangers and pilgrims"; the way of grace, back to the lost inheritance, had been marked out once for all, and the function of theology was but to maintain the landmarks inherited from the past. With the subtleties of the schools he had no sympathy, and the dialectics of the schoolmen quavered into silence before his terrible invective. Yet, within the limits of his mental horizon, Bernard's vision was clear enough. His very life proves with what merciless logic he followed out the principles of the Christian faith as he conceived it; and it is impossible to say that he conceived it amiss. For all his overmastering zeal he was by nature neither a bigot nor a persecutor. Even when he was preaching the crusade he interfered at Mainz to stop the persecution of the Jews, stirred up by the monk Radulf. As for heretics, "the little foxes that spoil the vines", these "should be taken, not by force of arms, but by force of argument", though, if any heretic refused to be thus taken, he considered "that he should be driven away, or even a restraint put upon his liberty, rather than that he should be allowed to spoil the vines." He was evidently troubled by the mob violence which made the heretics "martyrs to their unbelief." He approved the zeal of the people, but could not advise the imitation of their action, "because faith is to be produced by persuasion, not imposed by force"; adding, however, in the true spirit of his age and of his church, "it would without doubt be better that they should be coerced by the sword than that they should be allowed to draw away many other persons into their error." Finally, oblivious of the precedent of the Pharisees, he ascribes the steadfastness of these "dogs" in facing death to the power of the devil.

This is Bernard at his worst. At his best — and, fortunately, this is what is mainly characteristic of the man and his writings — he displays a nobility of nature, a wise charity and tenderness in his dealings with others, and a genuine humility, with no touch of servility, that make him one of the most complete exponents of the Christian life. His broadly Christian character is, indeed, witnessed to by the enduring quality of his influence. The author of the Imitatio drew inspiration from his writings; the reformers saw in him a medieval champion of their favorite doctrine of the supremacy of the divine grace; his works, down to the present day, have been reprinted in countless editions. This is perhaps due to the fact that the chief fountain of his own inspiration was the Bible. He was saturated in its language and in its spirit; and though he read it, as might be expected, uncritically, and interpreted its plain meanings allegorically — as the fashion of the day was — it saved him from the grosser aberrations of medieval Catholicism. He accepted the teaching of the church as to the reverence due to our Lady and the saints, and on feast-days and festivals these receive their due meed in his sermons; but in his letters and sermons their names are at other times seldom invoked. They were overshadowed completely in his mind by his idea of the grace of God and the moral splendor of Christ; "from Him do the Saints derive the odor of sanctity; from Him also do they shine as lights."

The cause of Bernard's extraordinary popular success as a preacher can only imperfectly be judged by the sermons that survive. These were all delivered in Latin, evidently to congregations more or less on his own intellectual level. Like his letters, they are full of quotations from and reference to the Bible, and they have all the qualities likely to appeal to men of culture at all times. "Bernard", wrote Erasmus in his Art of Preaching, "is an eloquent preacher, much more by nature than by art; he is full of charm and vivacity and knows how to reach and move the affections." The same is true of the letters and to an even more striking degree. They are written on a large variety of subjects, great and small, to people of the most diverse stations and types; and they help us to understand the adaptable nature of the man, which enabled him to appeal as successfully to the unlearned as to the learned.

Bernard's works fall into three categories: (1) Letters, of which over five hundred have been preserved, of great interest and value for the history of the period. (2) Treatises: (a) dogmatic and polemical, De gratia et libero arbitrio, written about 1127, and following closely the lines laid down by St. Augustine; De baptismo aliisque quaestionibus ad mag. Hugonem de S. Victore; Contra quaedam capitala errorum Abaelardi ad Innocentem II (in justification of the action of the synod of Sens); (b) ascetic and mystical, De gradibus humilitatis et superbiae, his first work, written perhaps about 1121; De diligendo Deo (about 1126); De conversione ad clericos, an address to candidates for the priesthood; De Consideratione, Bernard's last work, written about 1148 at the pope's request for the edification and guidance of Eugenius III; (c) about monasticism, Apologia ad Guilelmum, written about 1127 to William, abbot of St. Thierry; De laude novae militiae ad milites templi (c. 1132-36); De precepto et dispensatione, an answer to various questions on monastic conduct and discipline addressed to him by the monks of St. Peter at Chartres (some time before 1143); (d) on ecclesiastical government, De moribus et officio episcoporum, written about 1126 for Henry, Bishop of Sens; the De Consideratione mentioned above; (e) a biography, De vita et rebus gestis S. Maiachiae, Hiberniae episcopi, written at the request of the Irish abbot Congan and with the aid of materials supplied by him; it is of importance for the ecclesiastical history of Ireland in the 12th century; (f) sermons — divided into Sermones de tempore; de sanctis; de diversis; and eighty-six sermons, in Cantica Canticorum, an allegorical and mystical exposition of the Song of Solomon; (g) hymns. Many hymns ascribed to Bernard survive, e.g. Jesu dulcis memoria, Jesus rex admirabilis, Jesu decus angelicum, Salve caput cruentatum. Of these the three first are included in the Roman breviary. Many have been translated and are used in Protestant churches.


View article...


View article...

Thursday, August 15, 2013

FW: The uncertain future of our children. . .

 

Peters…

 

Feed: Pastoral Meanderings
Posted on: Friday, August 09, 2013 5:00 AM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Peters)
Subject: The uncertain future of our children. . .

 

Glen Stanton at Gospel Coalition has done us all a favor with some fact checking of oft repeated truths that end up being taken as Gospel when, in truth, they are distortions of the truth at best and downright lies at worst.

Here he tackles those who put the fear of God in parents, suggesting that their children will face an uncertain future as to their faith -- no matter what the parents do.  It has sold a lot of book and been the chatter at many conferences on the future shape of Christianity.

Stanton:

A handful of Christian authors have created a bit of a cottage industry peddling the scary news that the odds are not good that our young people stay strong in their faith into adulthood. Untrue.

There are important, effective, and relatively simple things parents and Christian workers can do to substantially increase the likelihood our young people will retain a thriving faith into and through their adult years. This is revealed in very strong, sophisticated research from some of the leading sociologists of youth and religion in the world.

Influencers of Faith

In the National Study of Youth and Religion (NSYR), noted Notre Dame professor Christian Smith and his team found:
• There are relatively simple factors that "powerfully shape" faith that remains strong through life.
• The biggest influencing factor is the faith of parents themselves and the practices they employ with their teenagers.
• These practices are simpler than many parents might imagine.
Increasing the likelihood of enduring faith in our young people is not limited to super-spiritual parents. In fact, the more "regular" and human you are the better. The factors, listed by the power of their influence, are:

Parents: Parents with a vibrant and lived-out faith tend to have children who have and keep a vibrant, lived-out faith. Smith doesn't mince words: "Parents are huge, absolutely huge, nearly a necessary condition" for a child to remain strong in his or her faith into young adulthood. He concludes "without question, the most important pastor a child will ever have in their life is a parent."

Personal Devotion: Along with at least one believing parent, it is important for the child to develop some practice and habit of regular prayer, church attendance, and reading of Scripture, growing in the conviction and experience that these practices are important for a happy life with God and others. And this practice doesn't have to be perfect, only relatively consistent. If teens and pre-teens have this in their younger years, they are remarkably more likely to maintain these faith practices into adulthood. It is important that this practice be learned and developed as an organic, natural part of their lives, rather than something they are expected to do solely out of duty or parental expectation. A faith developed as one's own tends to remain one's own.

Support/Encouragement from "Satellite Adults": Young people with lasting faith have the support of other adults around them who have a strong and inviting faith practice. These "satellite adults" who hover around our children in close relationship serve in supporting, affirming, and often times adding to the faith our children experience at home. They are powerful because our children observe, "If Coach Johnson/Principal Simpson/Youth Pastor Nigel/Deacon Stevenson/Aunt Wilma are such great people and so passionate and honest in their faith, maybe there's really something to it beyond what my parents think."
Our kids need to have the faith they learn at home supported and encouraged by the larger ring of admired adults around them.

Beliefs: Not as vital as the first three, but it helps if your child has some specific strongly held beliefs and practices.

First, a commitment to sexual chastity is critical for interesting reasons. Sexuality being such a powerful part of developing in one's teen and young adult years, having strong convictions and practices here indicate the presence of other deeply held and mature convictions regarding behavior. These usually cluster with faith convictions. It strengthens what these researchers call "cognitive resistance to modern secular culture."
Second, youth with lasting faith have the ability and support in honestly wrestling with and resolving their faith doubts. This teaches them to own their faith for themselves. And one is not likely to throw away what took hard work to develop.
Third, they should also experience and recognize God's hand in their lives through his faithfulness, answered prayer, and meaningful spiritual experiences.

Curiously, also having been teased for their faith is shown to be a faith strengthener, for this actually increases resolve and conviction. It requires they wrestle with the question of whether faith is really worth it.

Strong Faith Begets Strong Faith

Smith summarizes his team's findings in plain and direct language:

"religious outcomes in emerging adulthood are not random happenstance about which all bets are off after age 18. Instead, they often flow quite predictably from formative religious influences that shape a person's life in earlier years. . . . [The] religious commitments, practices, and investments made during childhood and the teenage years by parents and others in families and religious communities, matter---they make a difference." (emphasis added)

And these NSYR conclusions are corroborated by findings from a Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life analysis of religious convictions and practices of America's youth.  Don't listen to the naysayers and pessimists. Their claims are as baseless as they say your child's faith-sustaining prospects are.

My Comments

Our problem is NOT the children raised by pious parents who practice their faith in worship will jettison their faith as quickly as they leave the house.  Our problem in the Church is that there are fewer pious parents who practice their faith.  By practice the faith I mean attend worship 3 out of 4 Sundays, go to Sunday school as adults and take their children to Sunday school, see that their children participate in worship instead of regularly ditching them in the Nursery for babysitting, pray with them each night before bed and each day at meals (minimum), read the Bible to them, regularly include faith in their discussions with their children, and bring their children to catechism class... among other things.

I am NOT trying to paint parents in a bad light and heap scorn and shame on them.  I am only suggesting that a pious and active faith regularly practiced at church, home, etc... is the key.  A once a month or less appearance at church and Sunday school and occasional prayers, etc... do NOT provide the solid foundation on which a child's faith grows and flourishes.  I do understand the stresses placed upon the American family today but I also recognize that many of these are self-inflicted.  Our children learn that faith is not important when sports and leisure activities are acceptable alternatives to the practice of the faith in church and Sunday school.  The noble intentions of parents count little in the way of raising up children in the way of the Lord and passing on a living faith to our children.


View article...


View article...

FW: Lutherans: The Confessing Church

 

Confess…

 

Feed: Steadfast Lutherans
Posted on: Friday, August 09, 2013 7:15 AM
Author: Jim Pierce
Subject: Lutherans: The Confessing Church

 

concordiaLutherans confess their faith in Christ; that is, we actively give reasons for the hope of Christ in us. Evidence of this is clearly seen with the Book of Concord which spans fifty years and displays the profound seriousness Luther and our fathers took in putting clear Biblical expressions of our faith down on paper to be read by all and especially by any who would dare make these expressions their own confession of faith.

Of course, written expressions of what one believes, teaches, and confesses was not something invented by Lutherans. Perhaps the earliest Christian expression of the faith was given by the Apostle Peter and as recorded by Matthew, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Matthew 16:16). Here Peter is repeating back to our Lord what He has already revealed to him. When Peter confesses the truth, he is making it his own. As the Church taught its new converts and encountered errors, or was otherwise put into a position to "make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope" (1 Peter 3:15), it has expressed the true doctrine of Christ in the form of written confessions, or creeds. The Book of Concord is one gigantic creed expressing what the Lutheran confessors describe as without a doubt their teaching and belief. In other words, the Book of Concord is a confession where Lutherans make the teachings expressed in it 'our own.' Read what our confessors say in the Formula of Concord concerning the entirety of our Lutheran symbols:

"Since now, in the sight of God and of all Christendom [the entire Church of Christ], we wish to testify to those now living and those who shall come after us that this declaration herewith presented concerning all the controverted articles aforementioned and explained, and no other, is our faith, doctrine, and confession, in which we are also willing, by God's grace, to appear with intrepid hearts before the judgment-seat of Jesus Christ, and give an account of it; and that we will neither privately nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it, but, by the help of God's grace, intend to abide thereby: therefore, after mature deliberation, we have, in God's fear and with the invocation of His name, attached our signatures with our own hands"[1].

The Lutheran Confessions are not merely a set of condemnations of false doctrines existing at the time of their writing. The Confessions also contain positive statements which are also a true exposition of the Holy Scriptures; they are a solemn declaration of what Lutherans believe, teach and confess is the Christian faith today. Our Lutheran fathers unhesitatingly pronounced in the preface to the Book of Concord,

"Therefore we also have determined not to depart even a finger's breadth either from the subjects themselves, or from the phrases which are found in them, but, the Spirit of the Lord aiding us, to persevere constantly, with the greatest harmony, in this godly agreement, and we intend to examine all controversies according to this true norm and declaration of the pure doctrine"[2].

The confessors could determine "not to depart even a finger's breadth" from our Lutheran confession of faith, because they had set forth their answer to the question repeatedly found in the Small Catechism, "What does this mean?" and the answers given are explicit statements, given under oath, as to what is accepted by all Lutherans as the divine truth found in the Holy Scriptures. Here conditions are not set, these declarations and their acceptance are unconditional. They are either accepted as true expressions of the Holy Scriptures, or they are rejected. To depart from them is to lose the pure doctrine from heaven, Godly unity and harmony.

SMALLCATToday it is not surprising to find some attending Lutheran congregations who have never heard of the Book of Concord. Sadly, the Small Catechism is the only exposure some have with our Lutheran symbols and heritage. It is little wonder why there is so much confusion amongst us as to what it means to be a Lutheran Christian. Indeed, it is this confusion which serves as a breeding ground for false doctrine. Some identifying as Lutheran are comfortable in approving the teachings of Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, and Beth Moore, just to name some of the more popular false teachers exercising influence among Lutherans. I suspect much of this has to do with a common misconception that the laity must only pledge to believe and confess the contents of Luther's Small Catechism and the rest of the doctrines expressed in the Book of Concord are somehow optional. Such a view, however, is misplaced. Luther writes in his short preface to the Large Catechism,

"So a person who does not know this catechism could not be counted as a Christian or be admitted to any Sacrament, just as a mechanic who does not understand the rules and customs of his trade is expelled and considered incapable. Therefore, we must have the young learn well and fluently the parts of the catechism or instruction for children, diligently exercise themselves in them, and keep them busy with these parts"[3].

The Small Catechism is intended to be a brief introduction to a greater arena of life long study in the doctrines of the Church. Luther writes in the longer preface to the Large Catechism,

"Therefore, I again beg all Christians—especially pastors and preachers—not to think of themselves as doctors too soon and imagine that they know everything. (For imagination, like unshrunk cloth, will fall far short of the measure.) Instead, they should daily exercise themselves well in these studies and constantly use them"[4].

meme3Luther begs "all Christians… not to think of themselves as doctors too soon…." We don't want to minimize the standard through which we enjoy understanding of our common confession of faith as Lutherans. Our confessional forbears believed it was necessary to confess each and every article of the faith given to us in the Book of Concord. Pure doctrine is necessary for avoiding errors and confessing such doctrine, as they did, preserves the pure teaching for future generations. If our teachings are not read, taught, and confessed, then they are lost to us and our posterity, being gradually replaced with error. Importantly, too, we lose the unity gained by our agreement, or concord, found in the Lutheran confessions. Or, as stated in the Formula of Concord:

"Since for thorough, permanent unity in the Church it is, above all things, necessary that we have a comprehensive, unanimously approved summary and form wherein is brought together from God's Word the common doctrine, reduced to a brief compass, which the churches that are of the true Christian religion confess, just as the ancient Church always had for this use its fixed symbols"[5].

The Evangelical Lutheran Church is truly a confessing church.

______________________

[End Notes]

1  FC SD XII, 40  http://bookofconcord.org/sd-sects.php#para40

2  Book of Concord on-line http://bookofconcord.org/boc-intro.php#para23

3  McCain, P. T. (Ed.). (2005). Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions (pp. 355–356). St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House.

4 ibid.

5 FC SD, Rule and Norm, 1 http://bookofconcord.org/sd-ruleandnorm.php#para1

 


View article...


View article...

FW: Praying the Catechism

Weedon…

 

Feed: Weedon's Blog
Posted on: Thursday, August 15, 2013 1:24 PM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (William Weedon)
Subject: Praying the Catechism

 

I have a bit of a commute to work (about fifty minutes one way on a good day), and that allows some extra time for prayer. Here is a form of praying the Catechism I've been using lately (I've shared different but similar forms in the past). I thought others might find it useful too:

In the name...

Glory be to the Father (sung, of course!)

You shall have no other gods.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear, love and trust in You above all things; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not use Your name to curse, swear, lie or deceive, but rather call upon it in every trouble, pray, praise and give You thanks; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

Remember the sabbath day by keeping it holy.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not despise preaching and Your Word, but hold it sacred and gladly hear and learn it; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

Honor your father and your mother.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I may not despise or anger my father or other authorities, but honor them, serve and obey them, love and cherish them; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not murder.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I may not hurt or harm my neighbor in his body, but help and support him in every physical need; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not commit adultery.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I lead a chaste and decent life in word and deed, and so love and honor my wife; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not steal.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not take my neighbor's money or possessions or get them in any dishonest way, but help him to improve and protect his possessions and income; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not tell lies about my neighbor, betray him, slander him, or hurt his reputation, but defend him, speak well of him and explain everything in the kindest way; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not covet your neighbor's house.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not scheme to get my neighbor's inheritance and house or get it in a way that only appears right, but help and be of service to him in keeping it; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

You shall not covet your neighbor's wife, his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear and love You so that I do not seek to entice or force away my neighbor's wife, workers, or animals, or turn them against him, but urge them to stay and do their duty; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

He says: I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sins of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Lord God, since You threaten to punish all who break Your commandments, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to fear Your wrath that I may not do anything against them; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

Lord God, since You promise grace and every blessing to all who keep Your commandments, grant me the grace of Your Holy Spirit to love and trust in You and gladly do all that command; through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

I pray through the commandments like this four times. Then I pray the Our Father and sing the Gloria in Excelsis. By then, I'm sitting in traffic on the Poplar Street Bridge, waiting to enter St. Louis.


View article...

FW: Order Historic Lectionary Bulletin Covers Now!

 

At last…

 

Feed: Gottesdienst Online
Posted on: Monday, August 12, 2013 9:47 AM
Author: Pr. H. R.
Subject: Order Historic Lectionary Bulletin Covers Now!

 

CPH hath heard our plaintive cry and the new Historic Lectionary bulletin covers are ready to order! They include truly ecclesiastical artwork keyed to the Gospel Lesson for each Sunday and Feast. The new covers will start shipping with Ad Te Levavi in December. You can see all the information as well as sample covers here. I called and the switch over was easy as pie - just dial 800-325-3040 and you'll be done in a snap.

This is a great way to support the Historic Lectionary in our Synod: the more who sign up for the service, the better. And as I've mentioned before: you can't do full color artwork cheaper than this; I've tried and local print shops just can't compete with CPH's prices.

+HRC


View article...


View article...

FW: Liturgy, Neither Alone Nor Neutral

 

Consider…

 

Feed: Steadfast Lutherans
Posted on: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:16 AM
Author: Pastor Matt Richard
Subject: Liturgy, Neither Alone Nor Neutral

 

LITURGY"The liturgy, as a true service, is that which aids both the proclamation of and the hearing of the Gospel for the sake of faith, this is true worship."[1] The liturgy of the Church builds a framework for the worshiper to live the life of faith. The liturgy of the church, as found in the Lutheran Service Book, teaches the full counsel of God because it is based on God's very Word given in the Scriptures. Vilmos Vajita speaks about liturgy the following way,

Rites and ceremonies indeed form a training school of faith. To this extent, the pedagogical view is true to Luther. While ceremonies cannot create the faith, they can point to it. They are the scaffolding needed for building the church, but must not be confused with the church itself. They can serve to bring the immature (the young and simple folk) in the orbit of the Word and Sacrament where faith is born. As long as man is 'external,' such outward orders will be needed for the sake of love, for love and order belong together.[2]

Keep in mind that the liturgy does not simply respond to every blowing wind of culture. Rather, in the formation of the liturgy great care has been taken in choosing its forms, rites, and ceremonies knowing that they either support or hinder true worship.[3]

All of this said, I have found that a common misconception among many American Evangelicals is that practice is often viewed as neutral, thus it is deemed acceptable to separate doctrine and practice. Otherwise stated, I used to hold that the message needed to stay constant while the method (i.e., liturgy) could be flexible.  Methods don't matter and can change if they are neutral, right?  This justification of seeing church practices as being neutral is what leads to the division between doctrine and practice.  The division then allows for the de-emphasis of the practice of the liturgy. However, Klemet Preus in his book, The Fire and the Staff, states,

Doctrine and practice are more closely related, even interdependent, than is often realized. Doctrine affects practice and practice affects doctrine. The two are so intimately woven together that when you change one, you will inevitably change the other, sometimes without realizing what has happened.[4]

Doctrine not only provides knowledge to one's epistemological framework, but practice is also a source of knowledge for one's epistemological framework as well. They are connected. Furthermore, practice is not neutral, it contains theological presuppositions. While embracing different methodologies, for pragmatic reasons, a church can actually allow the theology of heterodox practices to bleed false truths back into the church's core theology. If practices are altered, inevitably the doctrine will be changed. Conversely, if doctrine is altered, practice will also be affected.  Thus, the need for preserving sound practice, as well as sound theology.

What of the times when practice is not changed but instead the liturgy and theology are kept separated (e.g., when doctrinal indifference or doctrinal apathy hollow out the liturgy making the divine service vacuous)? Detrimental results will again follow. Regin Prenter comments on this detrimental effect saying,

If liturgy is separated from theology, i.e., if it is no longer in its essence 'theology' or true witness to the revelation of God, it then becomes an end in itself, a 'good work,' performed with the intention of pleasing God. . . . If, on the other hand, theology is separated from liturgy, i.e., if it is no longer seen as a part of the liturgy of the Church, part of the living sacrifice of our bodies in the service of God and our fellow men, it too, becomes an end in itself, a human wisdom competing with and sometimes even rejecting the revelation of God. . . . These two dangers arising out of the neglect of the essential unity of liturgy and theology are, I think, imminent in our present situation in the Lutheran Church.[5]

So this understanding that practice is in fact, not neutral but rather intertwined with doctrine, is foundational to the preservation of right teaching in our churches. Thus it is most apparent there is a need for preserving sound practice of liturgy, neither separating nor believing the liturgy is neutral. This need is met through liturgical catechesis, as well as through the repetitive, common, and routine use of the Lutheran Service Book.

May the faithful and merciful God fill our hearts with an orthodox practice of liturgy that aids both the proclamation and the hearing of the Gospel for the sake of faith.

————–

[1] Montana District Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, "Theses on Worship," http://www.mtdistlcms.org/president/papers/ (15 June 2013)

[2] Vilmos Vajta, Luther on Worship: An Interpretation (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2004), 175.

[3] AC XXIV, 3 and AP XV, 20.

[4] Klemet Preus. The Fire and the Staff: Lutheran Theology In Practice (St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 2004), 14.

[5] Regin Prenter, "Liturgy and Theology," in Liturgy, Theology, and Music in the Lutheran Church, edited by Mandus A. Egge (Minneapolis, MN: International Choral Union, 1959), 141.


View article...


View article...