Thursday, August 15, 2013

FW: The ILC Remembers the First Lutheran Martyrs

 

Hymnody to help you remember…

 

Feed: Witness, Mercy, Life Together.
Posted on: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:19 AM
Author: Al Collver
Subject: The ILC Remembers the First Lutheran Martyrs

 

Vos

In Friday's Matins service participants remembered the life and witness of the first Lutheran Martyrs, Heinrich Voes and Johann Esch. A bit about them follows:

Esch and Voes were Augustinian monks of Saint Augustine's Monastery in Antwerp. When in 1522 all the monks there publicly professed Lutheran doctrine, the Bishop of Cambrai had them all arrested and imprisoned in Vilvorde, where they were interrogated by Jacob van Hoogstraten from Cologne and some dependably Catholic professors. When the monks realized that they risked being burned alive if they did not recant, all except three—Johann Esch, Heinrich Voes, and Lampertus Thorn—recanted. The recanting monks were released but were not returned to the monastery, which instead was declared defiled and soon demolished.

Esch, Voes, and Thorn, still held in custody, were questioned again by the ecclesiastical inquisition court, but they refused to recant. They were then handed over to the secular court and sentenced to death. They were taken to Brussels and held until the appointed day of execution on 1523 July 1. New attempts were made meanwhile to get them to renounce. Voes was brought first to the inquisitors, but he refused to recant. Esch also refused to renounce Lutheranism. Thorn asked for an additional four-day period to study the scriptures with respect to his views, and thus he was not executed then with Esch and Voes. Esch and Voes were summarily delivered to the executioner, brought to the marketplace in Brussels, and burned alive. For some reason, the charges against them were not read aloud as was the established practice; it has been conjectured that the authorities were concerned that hearing the charges might cause Lutheran ideas to spread among the public witnesses or that the ideas were already there and would ignite a protest.

On learning of the execution of Esch and Voes, Martin Luther wrote what is thought to be his first hymn, "Ein neues Lied wir heben an"[4] ("A new song we raise") which was printed in the Erfurt Enchiridion of 1524. This is generally known in English as John C. Messenger's translation by the first line and title "Flung to the Heedless Winds" and sung to tune IBSTONE composed in 1875 by Maria C. Tiddeman or to tune DENBY composed in 1904 by Charles J. Dale).[5]

Luther m 2

A New Song Here Shall Be Begun

"Among Luther's most faithful followers were members of his own order. As early as 1519 Jakob Spreng, the prior of the Augustinian monastery in Antwerp, defended Luther's teachings. In 1521 the Diet of Worms put Luther under the ban, called him a devil in human form, and branded his teaching heretical. In the parts of Germany where Lutheranism was strongest, the terms of this edict were never carried out. Luther's own prince, Frederick the Wise, refused to set his name to it, and, instead of prosecuting Luther, he had him taken into protective custody on the Wartburg.

In the Netherlands, however, political conditions were different. These lands were directly under the emperor. Here the Edict of Worms was carried out to the letter. In Antwerp Jakob Spreng and his successor Henry von Zütphen were arrested and threatened with execution. The remaining Augustinians were undeterred and continued to preach with great success, and so the whole monastery was laid to the ground and all the monks imprisoned. When the scholastics of the famous University of Louvain made it known that the friars would either have to recant or be burned at the stake, all but three renounced Lutheran teaching. The three confessors were convicted of heresy and condemned to death at the stake. The fate of one of them, Lambert Thorn, is not quite clear. He remained in prison and was not executed until 1528. Luther sent him a letter of comfort in 1524. But the other two, Heinrich Voes and Johann Esch, died martyrs' deaths at the market place in Brussels on July 1, 1523, the first blood witnesses of the Reformation.

Naturally, Luther was deeply moved. Instead of pitying these men for the sacrifice which they had been forced to offer, he considered their faithfulness a victory and their martyrdom an honor. But he was incensed by the rumors quickly spread by his enemies who claimed that Heinrich and Johann had with their dying breath disavowed their own teaching and made their "peace with the church." He wanted the blood witness of these two men to be known and the lies of his enemies to be exposed. And so he availed himself of the mass media most commonly used in his day for broadcasting important news. In an age without newspapers, radio, or television, when many people were illiterate, the folk song was the most common form of mass communication. Folk ballads told the stories of kings and villains, of treason and heroism, of battles and banditry. They were printed on broadsheets and widely sold. Wandering minstrels sang them in the market place, the roadside, and the tavern. The ballads quickly made their way from town to town, and soon they were known by heart. Their style was dramatic and direct, their language simple. Often they began with an introductory verse, such as "What shah we now take up and sing?"

Luther was thoroughly familiar with ballads such as these. In his student days he mastered the lute. On the way to the Diet of Worms he entertained the guests at an inn in Frankfurt, singing and accompanying himself on the lute.

It was this role Luther assumed when he wrote the ballad of the two Brussels martyrs, probably early in August, 1523. Beginning with the characteristic folk song phrase, "A new song here has be begun," it became the first hymn of the Reformation. Overnight, as it were, Luther became aware of his gift as a hymnist, and the bulk of his hymns appeared within the next few months. Although Luther wrote no other hymns in the form of a ballad, his martyrs' hymn served as the pattern for countless Anabaptist hymns that appeared in the following years, describing the fate of their martyrs in as many as one hundred stanzas."

Martin Luther, vol. 53, Luther's Works, Vol. 53: Liturgy and Hymns, ed. Jaroslav Jan Pelikan, Hilton C. Oswald and Helmut T. Lehmann (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1999), 211-12.

"A New Song Here Shall Be Begun"

Screen Shot 2013 08 09 at 9 22 02 AM

1 Walter's Wittenberg hymnal of 1524 and most later hymnals have the final cadence lead to the dominant instead of the tonic:

2 The first right fitly John was named,
So rich he in God's favor;
His brother, Henry—one unblamed,
Whose salt lost not its savor.
From this world they are gone away,
The diadem they've gained;
Honest, like God's good children, they
For his word life disdained,
And have become his martyrs.

3 The old arch-fiend did them immure
With terrors did enwrap them.
He bade them God's dear Word abjure,
With cunning he would trap them:
From Louvain many sophists came,
In their curst nets to take them,
By him are gathered to the game:
The Spirit fools doth make them—
They could get nothing by it.

4 Oh! they sang sweet, and they sang sour;
Oh! they tried every double;
The boys they stood firm as a tower,
And mocked the sophists' trouble.
The ancient foe it filled with hate
That he was thus defeated
By two such youngsters—he, so great!
His wrath grew sevenfold heated,
He laid his plans to burn them.

5 Their cloister-garments off they tore,
Took off their consecrations;
All this the boys were ready for,
They said Amen with patience.
To God their Father they gave thanks
That they would soon be rescued
From Satan's scoffs and mumming pranks,
With which, in falsehood masked,
The world he so befooleth.

6 Then gracious God did grant to them
To pass true priesthood's border,
And offer up themselves to him,
And enter Christ's own order,
Unto the world to die outright,
With falsehood made a schism,
And come to heaven all pure and white,
To monkery be the besom,
And leave men's toys behind them.

7 They wrote for them a paper small,
And made them read it over;
The parts they showed them therein all
Which their belief did cover.
Their greatest fault was saying this:
"In God we should trust solely;
For man is always full of lies,
We should distrust him wholly:"
So they must burn to ashes.

8 Two huge great fires they kindled then,
The boys they carried to them;
Great wonder seized on every man,
For with contempt they view them.
To all with joy they yielded quite,
With singing and God-praising;
The sophs had little appetite
For these new things so dazing.
Which God was thus revealing.

9 They now repent the deed of blame,
Would gladly gloze it over;
They dare not glory in their shame,
The facts almost they cover.
In their hearts gnaweth infamy—
They to their friends deplore it;
The Spirit cannot silent be:
Good Abel's blood out-poured
Must still besmear Cain's forehead.

10 Leave off their ashes never will;
Into all lands they scatter;
Stream, hole, ditch, grave—nought keeps them still
With shame the foe they spatter.
Those whom in life with bloody hand
He drove to silence triple,
When dead, he them in every land,
In tongues of every people,
Must hear go gladly singing.

11 But yet their lies they will not leave,
To trim and dress the murther;
The fable false which out they gave,
Shows conscience grinds them further.
God's holy ones, e'en after death,
They still go on belying;
They say that with their latest breath,
The boys, in act of dying,
Repented and recanted.

12 Let them lie on for evermore—
No refuge so is reared;
For us, we thank our God therefore,
His word has reappeared.
Even at the door is summer nigh,
The winter now is ended,
The tender flowers come out and spy;
His hand when once extended
Withdraws not till he's finished.

Martin Luther, vol. 53, Luther's Works, Vol. 53: Liturgy and Hymns, ed. Jaroslav Jan Pelikan, Hilton C. Oswald and Helmut T. Lehmann (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1999), 214-16.


View article...


View article...

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Received for Review

 



Evolution Vs. God: Shaking the Foundations of Faith. Living Waters Publications, 2013. (Review copy provided by New Leaf Publishing Group, www.nlpg.com.) DVD movie. $9.95. (For low-cost bulk copies, call 800-437-1893.) EvolutionVsGod.com  www.livingwaters.com  (LHP)


View article...

Thursday, August 8, 2013

FW: NPR.org - Modern Hymn Writers Aim To Take Back Sunday

 

An interesting, if limited article and interview. Not much is said about those of us who never gave up liturgy and hymnody…

 


Subject: NPR.org - Modern Hymn Writers Aim To Take Back Sunday

 

NPR

Rev. Paul J Cain thought you would be interested in this story

Modern Hymn Writers Aim To Take Back Sunday

 

In recent decades, worship music has trended away from the classic "organ backed" hymns, and churches have moved to rocking praise songs made popular by Christian radio. Now, some modern hymn writers are looking back to a more traditional style.

Read this story

This email was sent by: NPR,1111 N. Capitol St. NE Washington, DC, 20002, United States.


View article...

Monday, August 5, 2013

FW: Upcoming Volumes of Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces

 

!!

 

Feed: Concordia Academic
Posted on: Monday, August 05, 2013 1:01 AM
Author: mayesbtg
Subject: Upcoming Volumes of Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces

 

Johann Gerhard, theologian at Jena

Johann Gerhard, theologian at Jena

2013          On Creation and Predestination

Includes the commonplaces On Creation and Angels, On Providence, On Election and Reprobation, and On the Image of God in Man before the Fall. This volume is notable for its section on the angels and its discussion of many aspects of the doctrine of election.

2014          On Sin and Free Choice

Includes the commonplaces On Original Sin, On Actual Sins, and On Free Choice. This volume is notable in opposing "decision theology," in which one's conversion and salvation depend ultimately on human choice.

2015          On the Law

Includes the commonplaces On the Law of God and On Ceremonial and Forensic Laws.

2016          On the Gospel and Repentance

As the title says, this one includes the commonplaces On the Gospel and On Repentance. This volume is notable for its in-depth examination of confession and absolution, one of the means of grace.

2017          On Justification

Includes just one commonplace, On Justification through Faith—right in time for the quincentennial of the Reformation. (Luther posted his theses for debate on indulgences on Oct. 31, 1517).

Volumes are released every year in the late summer or early fall. Subscribe and save at www.cph.org/gerhard. Become a subscriber to Theological Commonplaces and each new volume of Gerhard's monumental series will be shipped to you automatically. Currently, volumes are priced at $54.99, but as a subscriber you will pay only $38.49, a 30% savings. Your subscription starts with the newest volume and you will continue to receive each new volume. As an added bonus, new subscribers can purchase previously released volumes at the same 30% savings.


View article...


View article...

FW: Upcoming Volumes of Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces

 

!!

 

Feed: Concordia Academic
Posted on: Monday, August 05, 2013 1:01 AM
Author: mayesbtg
Subject: Upcoming Volumes of Johann Gerhard, Theological Commonplaces

 

Johann Gerhard, theologian at Jena

Johann Gerhard, theologian at Jena

2013          On Creation and Predestination

Includes the commonplaces On Creation and Angels, On Providence, On Election and Reprobation, and On the Image of God in Man before the Fall. This volume is notable for its section on the angels and its discussion of many aspects of the doctrine of election.

2014          On Sin and Free Choice

Includes the commonplaces On Original Sin, On Actual Sins, and On Free Choice. This volume is notable in opposing "decision theology," in which one's conversion and salvation depend ultimately on human choice.

2015          On the Law

Includes the commonplaces On the Law of God and On Ceremonial and Forensic Laws.

2016          On the Gospel and Repentance

As the title says, this one includes the commonplaces On the Gospel and On Repentance. This volume is notable for its in-depth examination of confession and absolution, one of the means of grace.

2017          On Justification

Includes just one commonplace, On Justification through Faith—right in time for the quincentennial of the Reformation. (Luther posted his theses for debate on indulgences on Oct. 31, 1517).

Volumes are released every year in the late summer or early fall. Subscribe and save at www.cph.org/gerhard. Become a subscriber to Theological Commonplaces and each new volume of Gerhard's monumental series will be shipped to you automatically. Currently, volumes are priced at $54.99, but as a subscriber you will pay only $38.49, a 30% savings. Your subscription starts with the newest volume and you will continue to receive each new volume. As an added bonus, new subscribers can purchase previously released volumes at the same 30% savings.


View article...


View article...

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Received for Review

 


Gerhard, Johann. Translated by Richard J. Dinda. Edited by Benjamin T. G. Mayes and Joshua J. Hayes. On Creation and Predestination (Theological Commonplaces: XIII-XI). St. Louis: Concordia, 2013. 390 Pages. Cloth. $54.99. https://www.cph.org/p-12928-on-creation-and-predestination-theological-commonplaces.aspx (LHP)

Luther, Martin. Edited by Benjamin T. G. Mayes and James L. Langebartels. Church Postil I (Luther's Works 75). St. Louis: Concordia, 2013. 460 Pages. Cloth. $49.99. https://www.cph.org/p-22560-luthers-works-volume-75-church-postil-i.aspx (LHP)


View article...

Friday, August 2, 2013

FW: Another Look: The Day of Salvation?

 

Consider…

 

Feed: internetmonk.com
Posted on: Thursday, August 01, 2013 10:09 AM
Author: Chaplain Mike
Subject: Another Look: The Day of Salvation?

 

OutdoorRevival

This was first posted in April, 2010.

I remember the day I changed my thinking about when I was "saved."

I had grown up in a mainline Protestant denomination, was baptized and confirmed, attended worship and Sunday School, and dabbled with youth group. However, in my teen years, I was not deeply involved.

Then the big change came.

At the beginning of my senior year in high school, our family moved across the country, an event that precipitated a personal crisis in my life. The foundations were removed from beneath me. For a time, I struggled with depression, drugs and alcohol, loss of meaning, purpose, and direction.

In the midst of my wandering, God graciously brought me into contact with some fellow students who attended a local Baptist church. I saw a real difference in them, and their joy was attractive. I became part of the group, though I hesitated to come forward and confess my faith as a Christian. Eventually, however, I responded to an altar call, went forward and expressed my desire to be baptized as a new follower of Jesus. From that point on, through his gracious preserving power I have never turned back.

For many years, if you had asked me when I "became a Christian," I would have answered, in true revivalist fashion, that the day I "went forward" was "the day of my salvation." That was when I "met Jesus," "got saved," and was "transferred from darkness to light."

Then I met Joe.

KneelCommunionThis was during my seminary days, when I pastored a Bible church in the northern suburbs of Chicago. Joe worked at the college affiliated with our seminary and started attending our church. One day in my Sunday School class he shared his testimony. To my surprise, he said he had attended a United Methodist church in one of the towns where I had lived. He shared how the pastor helped him become a Christian, enter the process of living as Jesus' disciple, and discern God's calling for his life.

The story shook me, because I had attended that church and had sat under that pastor in worship and confirmation classes. After my experience at the Baptist church altar, I had always looked back upon that Methodist church and its minister and considered them "liberal," not faithfully proclaiming the Gospel. Now here was someone giving testimony to how he had met Jesus there!

As I pondered this dissonance between the narrative that Joe spoke and the one that had been running through my head for years, a few memories began to resurface. In particular, I recalled the night before our class was confirmed in front of the congregation. The pastor gathered us in a small chapel and led us in a service to prepare our hearts for the event. To this day, I don't remember a word he said. However, I do recall that he shared a personal story of his own encounter with Jesus and that I was deeply touched. Specifically, what I remember was a sense of great weight and seriousness descending upon me as I participated in that service.

"It will also come to pass that before they call, I will answer" (Isaiah 65:24). It was several more years before I answered the Baptist invitation.

From the day I heard Joe's story, I began to think about my "salvation" differently.

  • Who knows how many times God had gotten my attention, spoken to me, touched me, blessed me, or helped me in the past?
  • Who knows how many times my heart had been impressed and had responded with a form of faith consistent with my age and understanding at that point in my life?
  • In the midst of all my wanderings, who knows how many times I turned in the right direction at the hidden impulse of the Spirit's voice? God had been savingly active in my life long before I answered an altar call.

American revivalism insists that we pinpoint a date, a time, a moment of decision — "the day of your salvation." But is the Bible this reductionistic?

  • Did all the disciples have sudden conversion experiences?
  • Even those believers who did — say Paul — was his a matter of a "personal decision"?
  • What about many of the other extraordinary experiences of Scripture, when God meets a person and changes his or her life in an instant? Are all these stories necessarily about "salvation" being transferred in that moment from darkness to light, from one eternal destiny to another?
  • You may ask, what about the Gospel preaching in the Book of Acts? Though Acts reports many "at the moment" transformational experiences, we must remember that Acts is a book of missions, dealing with first generation Christians, many of whom had no background in Biblical teaching whatsoever. Is their experience meant to be the template for everyone who comes to believe in Jesus?
  • What about all the people of faith who are simply presented to us in Scripture as such, with no reference whatsoever to a moment of decision or conversion (Mary, Simeon, Anna, etc.)?
  • And what do we do with the story of someone like John the Baptizer, of whom it is said he was filled with the Spirit from his mother's womb?

CathedralCeilingRevivalist theology cannot adequately explain the intricacies of God's dealings with us.

The revivalist mindset wants it simple and clear. We want it black and white. We want to know who is in and who is out. We want to mark the sheep and goats now. We want to be able to define, distinguish, and properly deal with the haves and the have-nots. We want it to be as clear as the "I do" of a wedding ceremony. We want to collect the forms and know precisely who has checked the right boxes. We want to have and give assurance of salvation based on something we can see with our own eyes and measure with our own tools. We want to be able to give the clear testimony, "Yesterday I was lost, today I'm found."

For example,

  • The revivalists among us don't like to think that God can work through infant baptism, as the pastor applies the Word of the Gospel mixed with water, to bring that child into his family and begin the process of "by grace through faith" that brings us salvation. (Infant baptism is NOT the focus of this post, so forget about it if you want to make that your issue in the comments!)
  • We can't grasp salvation as something that occurs over time, not in an identifiable "moment," and that its workings may be entirely mysterious to us in terms of specific dates, times, and experiences.
  • We don't like to admit that a person might have several "conversions" over the course of a lifetime, and that we may not always be able to define exactly what each one entails.

One weakness of the revivalist approach is that it separates a person's life into two distinct periods, one "without God" and one "with God". It cannot tolerate nuances in that black/white division. God's work before that "day of salvation" is discounted, especially if "conversion" involves moving from one form of Christian faith to another, as happened with me.

In a post on Jesus Creed, Scot McKnight writes,

Converts develop an anti-rhetoric for their former theology and faith. This anti-rhetoric denounces their old faith and forms into an apologetical defense of their new narrative.

Ask a strong evangelical who was formerly Catholic what Catholics believe and you will often hear something that has little do with what you find in the Catechism or in the official statements. Instead, you will get a powerful rhetoric that caricatures RC theology and beliefs: you will hear terms like superstition, magic and popery. You will get terms about worshiping Mary and idolatry and works salvation. Sometimes this anti-rhetoric is vile. I've heard it hundreds of times. You can try but you will rarely succeed at getting such folks to see the positive gospel within Catholic theology.

With me, it wasn't Catholicism, but my mainline Protestant roots that I rejected as anti-Gospel. Of course, every branch on the Christian tree has its problems, some more serious than others, but I didn't criticize from the standpoint of a theologian. I had developed the "anti-rhetoric" syndrome McKnight describes above. My "conversion" experience led me to denounce the whole of my life before that day as "B.C." (before Christ). It was only upon deeper, more mature reflection later in life that I understood I had never lived a day without God, and that he was savingly active long before I recognized it, had an experience, or made a decision.

This is one reason I identify myself as a "post-evangelical" today. American evangelicalism has its roots sunk deeply into the ethos of revivalism. It's about preaching for decision. And it's the decision that gets it done. In a moment.

In my humble opinion, it is God that gets it done, and his ways are not our ways.


View article...


View article...

FW: Can You Purchase the Entire Collection of “You Can Do It!” Titles? Yes, you can.

 

J

 

Feed: Cyberbrethren Lutheran Blog Feed
Posted on: Thursday, August 01, 2013 9:58 AM
Author: Paul T. McCain
Subject: Can You Purchase the Entire Collection of "You Can Do It!" Titles? Yes, you can.

 

155212

 

You can now purchase the entire set of the YOU CAN DO IT titles, at one time, for a 30% discount. Simply click here and … there you go.

.

.

.

.


View article...


View article...

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

FW: Multi-volume translation project comes to completion

 

Peters…

 

Feed: Concordia Academic
Posted on: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:57 AM
Author: steinersj
Subject: Multi-volume translation project comes to completion

 

Now available in English for the first time!Peters Commentary Series

The German edition of Albrecht Peters' Commentary on Luther's Catechisms has long been the gold standard of research on the catechetical texts of the great reformer. Now English-speaking researchers and catechists can read the fifth and final volume of the series, Confession and Christian Life. This volume, translated by Dr. Thomas H. Trapp, explores Martin Luther's catechetical writings on Confession and Absolution, Household Responsibilities, Marriage, and Baptism, as well as his Household Prayers, within a biblical, historical, and systematic context.

CPH would like to extend a special note of thanks to Dr. Trapp as well as to the other two translators who worked on these volumes, Dr. Holger Sonntag and Dr. Daniel Thies, for their excellent work on the series.

Dr. Trapp answered the following questions so that readers can find out more about the series and this last volume in particular:

In what ways is Peters' commentary on Luther's catechism useful to researchers, pastors, and all Christians?
Peters' five-volume commentary stands alone today in terms of its breadth and depth. Each volume starts with a history of the development and use of the topic in Church history. So, for example, Peters looks at the history of the development of the Creed and each of the parts. He notes what is particularly accented in terms of its teaching. He develops a thesis about how each part was interpreted at the time of Luther. Luther's unique contribution in this regard is that he accentuates the pro me, the pro nobis, that Jesus died for me personally, for us. Peters shows how alternate viewpoints skew the understanding of the Gospel and salvation, leading away from the complete peace that is ours in Christ. It was not enough to be "just" a member of the Church at large. Salvation was personal for Luther.

Someone might think, "Luther's catechism is pretty simple. How much more can really be said about it?" Now that you have translated several volumes of Peters' great commentary, how would you respond?
Luther remarked that he himself could never comprehend everything taught in the catechism. I have been captivated by how much is there and how my own understanding and perception has grown. The reasoning provided in the commentaries provides a backdrop for Luther's insights. I personally recommend these volumes for pastors and teachers who want deeper background for teaching young people, but also to enrich the teaching of adults, whether in instruction classes or for ongoing growth in the faith. It may be that such an observer is unaware of how the "simple" is a distillation of revelation that may be anything but simple. Luther has been accused of being simplistic, maybe even advocating a tritheism (Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier). Peters addresses the issue by pointing out that the catechism was fashioned as a starting point for teaching the faith. He notes that in his other sermons and writings, Luther fleshes out the complexities of the relationships among the persons of the Trinity and what that means for salvation.

Volume 5 of Peters' commentary deals with several different topics. What are the strengths of this volume?

The original edition of Luther's Small Catechism did not deal with confession and absolution under a separate heading. The List of Household Responsibilities was also a later addendum. Luther's prayers for the beginning and end of the day and for mealtime are provided. All confirmands are used to seeing these elements. But it is a surprise to many to find liturgical pieces for marriage and baptism included in the Book of Concord. These do not appear in our "Small Catechism."

I was intrigued throughout. I was struck by the emphasis on absolution in "Confession and Absolution." Christians are deeply puzzled about what to confess and how, even though Luther limits confession before a pastor to those sins that trouble the believer. A greater emphasis on absolution and the declaration of grace in public and private confession and absolution leads away from wondering "if we are confessing correctly." It is obviously important to consider sin in all its seriousness. But to worry about whether we have confessed "enough" leads away from the comfort of the Gospel. Sins confessed before the pastor will deal with issues from the Second Table of the Law, as can be seen in how Luther constructs the List of Household Responsibilities. The Little Baptismal Booklet was composed earlier, coming from two editions of that liturgical piece (1523, 1526), as Luther distanced himself from medieval practices that obscured the focus on the gracious action of God. The Little Marriage Booklet delves into the aspects of marriage that involve both the world and the church. Discussion of various medieval views of marriage and Luther's own marriage are delightful additions to the study of the liturgical elements, though it took much research for me to discover the terminology for different concepts of marriage for "love" or for "money."

Does this volume challenge contemporary views on these topics?

It is most important that the issue of absolution, as a means of grace, is accentuated as central throughout. In each of the topics discussed, peace with God that results in peace with the brother links the two together. For those who would see worship as time for praise and fellowship, this grounds both in the gracious action of the triune God to reconcile us to Himself, which leads to a relationship with others that is based on grace and not just on common interests. The Church provides the place where the Christian faith can be lived out in the specifically Christian life. It will certainly challenge anyone who believes that absolution comes as a result of acts on the part of the believer to satisfy God's expectations. I found myself less "challenged" and more "deepened" in my appreciation of what is discussed by our Lord in the Book of John already in His first interaction with the disciples on the evening of the first Easter. Of course, for those who seek to relate to God apart from Christ, the entire topic will seem foreign. For Christians who seek peace with God and the neighbor, the sense of release from sin and guidance in the new life comes front and center.

∞∞∞∞∞

 

You can purchase Confession and Christian Life, along with the other four books in the series, in both paperback and Kindle format at cph.org.

 


View article...


View article...

Monday, July 29, 2013

FW: Tools in Luther’s Homiletical Toolbox

 

Luther's Pulpit practice…

 

Feed: Concordia Academic
Posted on: Monday, July 29, 2013 12:12 PM
Author: mayesbtg
Subject: Tools in Luther's Homiletical Toolbox

 

Luther's Works, vol. 75 (Church Postil I)

Luther's Works, vol. 75 (Church Postil I)

The first volume of Luther's Church Postil (LW 75, sermons for the church year) is out, and I hope you've been enjoying it. Recently, I've had the pleasure of reviewing the next volume of the Church Postil, and as I did so, I became very aware of Luther's preaching style. Luther's preaching was popular at his time, but why? I think readers of these sermons and all preachers can benefit by understanding the basic structure of how Luther preaches.

  • Summary of the text. Luther begins with a brief summary of the text, never with a story, analogy, or statistic. He goes straight to the Bible text and summarizes it in a sentence or two before moving to a more in-depth study.
  • Luther either explains the text verse by verse or section by section. It appears that he has considered the rhetorical outline of the pericope, because Luther often gives an enumeration of parts of the text. After citing the Bible verse or section, Luther explains the following:
    • What this passage says and means. Luther explains what the important words mean or restates the passage in his own words. This is usually quite short.
    • Application to himself and his hearers in faith and love. Here Luther directly applies the text to his people at his time. If the Bible text is Law, he explains what the people are to do or avoid, in plain words. If the Bible text is Gospel, he explains the forgiveness and mercy of God in Christ, again in plain words. The important point is that this is not just something that happened back in Bible times; it applies to the hearers right now. This means that Luther is deriving the doctrine from the text and setting it forth for the people to believe, or he is deriving the moral teaching from the text and setting it forth for the people to do.

The next few points are not always present for each Bible verse or section. Luther uses them like tools to communicate the verse or section under consideration.

    • Illustrations. Luther gives illustrations of the moral teaching or the doctrine being discussed in the Bible passage. These illustrations are often biblical.
    • Antithesis. The rhetorical device of antithesis is the practice of setting forth the opposite, so that what God's Word teaches is understood by the contrast. For Luther, antithesis takes the form of negative illustrations of sin and false doctrine. Luther can be quite vehement here. His goal is to show how shameful sin and false doctrine are and to make the people loathe sin and false doctrine. This is where Luther often attacks the monks, pope, fanatics, popular false beliefs, vices, and superstitions.
    • Apparent contradictions. Sometimes Scripture seems to contradict itself. In such cases, Luther spends some time resolving the apparent conflict and explaining the possible ways in which the text should be understood so that one part of Scripture is not read in a way that conflicts with other parts of Scripture. This helps his hearers to understand Scripture in its canonical context and to let Scripture interpret Scripture.
  • Allegories. As the final part of the sermon in the Church Postil, Luther often adds the "hidden meaning" or allegories. Allegories are used only with histories, and Luther does not use them to prove doctrine, but rather to illustrate what he has already taught from the literal sense of Scripture. He usually applies these allegories to the conflict of Satan against Christ, of human teachings against the preaching of the Gospel, or of salvation by works against salvation by faith. These allegories seem sometimes to be influenced by traditional, patristic readings of the text (such as the interpretation of the gifts of the Magi in the Epiphany Gospel). But at other times they could be Luther's own inventions and can be just as fanciful as any allegory one reads in the early church fathers. That said, Luther's allegories always are in harmony with the broader message of Scripture (the "analogy of faith"), and so his allegories are effective in illustrating doctrines that are found clearly stated in the literal sense of Scripture.
  • Admonition. As an appendix, many of Luther's sermons outside of the Church Postil also include an admonition. The admonition was essentially moral teaching, ethical encouragement, or even rebuke of sin, given as the last word of the sermon. This admonition often was related to the text for the sermon, though sometimes it was unrelated. It was a point that Luther felt had to be addressed for the common good of the parish and community and could not be put off until a later time. Modern Lutherans, having learned from C. F. W. Walther to end their sermons with a word of Gospel and grace, will likely find this disturbing. Luther did not hesitate to leave his hearers with the Law—as moral teaching, encouragement, or rebuke. Rather than focusing on ending each sermon with Gospel, Luther was more interested in following the shape of the text at hand. If the text was mostly Law, Luther preached mostly Law. If the text was mostly Gospel, Luther preached mostly Gospel. And Luther also had no problem with concluding a sermon by telling people what God wanted them to do. In Luther's mind, at least, this did not entail a confusion of Law and Gospel. Rather than dismissing Luther as one who was unable to preach the Law-Gospel distinction that he taught elsewhere, we would do well to see why Luther preached this way and consider whether we have not misunderstood what the distinction of Law and Gospel is all about.

A final thought about Luther's preaching: The reformer studied and prepared for his preaching, but he did not preach from a manuscript. Instead, he usually preached from a brief outline or notes. Stenographers recorded his sermons, and then sometimes these shorthand, Latin-German notes were filled out and put into print. For an excellent example of how Luther's preaching went from an outline to stenographer's notes to print, see LW 69:373–401.

Become a subscriber to Luther's Works and save! The new volumes of Luther's Works American Edition are currently priced at $49.99 each, but as a subscriber you pay only $34.99, a 30% savings. To become a subscriber or for additional information, go to cph.org/luthersworks .

Benjamin T. G. Mayes


View article...


View article...

FW: Concordia Commentary Update: What’s Next?

 

!!!

 

Feed: Cyberbrethren Lutheran Blog Feed
Posted on: Monday, July 29, 2013 8:36 AM
Author: Paul T. McCain
Subject: Concordia Commentary Update: What's Next?

 

Screen Shot 2013-07-29 at 9.36.05 AM

I thought you would appreciate an update on the status of the Concordia Commentary series. As it turns out, the Concordia Commentary series is, at this point, the largest ongoing commentary being published in the Protestant community, and has earned high regard and respect from scholars from across all Christian denominations and students of Biblical literature (Christian or not). We have been publishing two volumes a year, for well over ten years now.

We have quite a line up. We also make all these commentaries available via the LOGOS software platform. I'm able to take an advanced look at the materials as it comes in and … thanks be to God! What a blessing these commentaries will be to the Church.

Please remember that the best possible prices for the print volumes is available via subscription. I urge any laypersons reading this to make it possible for your pastor to receive these volumes. They will be of enormous benefit to him for his preaching and his teaching of God's Word. Read more about the Concordia Commentary subscription program, by clicking this link. To view all volumes presently available, click this link.

Here is what's coming next. I have no further details to share at this time beyond what I'm posting here.

Mark 1:1 – 8:26 by James Voelz (Fall 2013)

Galatians by Andrew Das (Spring 2014)

Isaiah 56-66 by Reed Lessing (Fall 2014)

Ephesians by Andrew Das (Spring 2015)

John 1–6 by William Weinrich (Fall 2015

Romans 9–16 by Michael Middendorf (Spring 2016)

Hebrews by John Kleinig (Fall 2016)

Mark 8:27-16:8 by James Voelz (Spring 2017)

 


View article...


View article...

Friday, July 12, 2013

FW: Classical education. . .

 

Peters…

 

Feed: Pastoral Meanderings
Posted on: Friday, July 12, 2013 5:00 AM
Author: noreply@blogger.com (Pastor Peters)
Subject: Classical education. . .

 

Check it out!

A visit with a shut in ended up talking about education (the person had been involved in education for most of the adult life).  It ended up with a lament that too much emphasis is placed on vocational education -- simple training to do a job.  Now this person understands the fact that education, especially secondary, has become expensive and often peripheral to job openings and employment possibilities, but this person also insists that a liberal arts education (could we call it "classical" education) should not be allowed to disappear.

The person spent a life in literature and sadly reflected upon the fact that you can hardly find a book in his kids homes -- even though they are well educated and economically successful.  They do not read -- not paper or digital.  The shut in found this tragic for the adult children and the grandchildren (some of whom graduated from ivy league schools).  They seem oblivious to the great body of literature which has become the hallmark of learning (at least in the past).

I related a conversation about the movie "Gatsby" in which a twenty something young woman suggested that the movie was so great she wished that it had come out in book form.  Duhhhhhh.  As a child growing up in pre-politically correct times, even the cartoons were replete with references to great literature, opera, music, and history (cannot forget Bugs Bunny massaging Elmer Fudd's scalp while Rossini's Barber of Seville played in the background).  Today it is much more likely that children's videos and programming has little to draw them into the tremendous body of classical literature and music, much less history!

That led me to a new book by Cheryl Swope called A Beautiful Education for Any Child.  According to one reviewer:  Classical education is best-known for its powerful academic chops, for its cultural richness, and for its compatibility with the Christian view of the world.  You can Google her and the book or buy it here on Amazon.  It is a wonderful book -- accessible for the general public, born from a home schooling experience, and addressing the whole way we view education at large.

Another fan:

Cheryl Swope ostensibly writes about special education, but she also makes one of the clearest and most compelling cases for classical education in print. The first argument of the book is that academically-challenged students are human beings too, and they deserve an education commensurate with that fact. While current special education doctrine favors compromising on content, Cheryl proposes only to moderate its measure. If a child cannot accommodate the amount or depth of knowledge of most children, it is not less, but more important that what they learn be of the highest quality. She implicitly understands St. Thomas Aquinas' principle that the slightest knowledge of the greatest things is greater than the greatest knowledge of the slightest things. Her second argument is that it has been done and can be done. How many people know that Helen Keller had a classical education? And if a person who was blind and deaf could achieve what she achieved, how much more can a student do who faces less severe challenges? Cheryl shows how, in an important sense, classical education can open the eyes of the blind and unstop the ears of the deaf.

I heartily commend it.


View article...


View article...

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

FW: Ach Gott! wie herzlich liebst du doch

 

A Table of Duties hymn…

 

Feed: HYMNOGLYPT
Posted on: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 1:54 PM
Author: Matt Carver (Matthaeus Glyptes)
Subject: Ach Gott! wie herzlich liebst du doch

 

Here is my translation of a hymn on the Preaching Office "Ach Gott, wie herzlich liebst du doch" (G. Österreicher, ca. 1700). More properly, it is a hymn on what hearers owe their pastor, as Luther puts it. Appointed tune, variously "Ach Gott vom Himmel, sieh darein," "Allein, Gott in der Höh sei Ehr," or "Es ist das Heil uns kommen her." It is included, among other places, in Lehre und Wehre vol. 55, p. 491, by the Commission for the revision of the German hymnal, as a proposal for the expansion. Italics indicate major interpolations not in the original text.

 

O GOD, what love Thou showest us
Thy poor, on earth abiding,
From heaven high to open thus
Thy will for our confiding!
The Preaching Office Thou hast sent
To speak Thy Word, that we repent,
And trust in Christ our Savior.

2. We pray Thee, God, our Refuge high,
Unfailingly and surely
Thy faithful servants to supply,
To teach Thy Scripture purely!
Give us Thy Spirit's pow'r devout,
To hearken well and have no doubt
And live thereby as holy.

3. Help us to honor and to love
Thy faithful preachers truly,
And heed their teaching good, and prove
In life Thy doctrine daily.
Since they Thy high command dispose
And o'er our soul keep watch as those
That must account give for it.

4. Lord, grant therefore that we may share
With them all good and blessing,
That they with joy their work may bear,
And not with groans distressing,
For that would be to us no gain,
As we are taught in Scripture plain;
Oh, keep us from all error!

Translation © 2013 Matthew Carver.

GERMAN

1. Ach Gott! wie herzlich liebst du doch
uns arme Leut auf Erden!
Daß du uns von dem Himmel hoch
dein Willen kund läßt werden
durchs Predigamt in deinem Wort,
welchs jetzund schallt an unserm Ort,
daß wir Buß tun und glauben.

2. Wir bitten dich, o höchster Hort!
du wollst allzeit bescheren
getreue Diener, die dein Wort
rein, unverfälscht uns lehren;
gieb uns deins Geistes Kraft und Macht,
daß wir es hören mit Andacht,
und heilig darnach leben.

3. Hilf, daß wir treue Prediger
von Herzen ehrn und lieben,
und folgen ihrer guten Lehr,
darin uns täglich üben,
weil sie verrichten dein Befehl,
und wachen über unsre Seel
auch Rechnschaft dafür geben.

4. Herr, gib Du, daß wir ihnen nun
erzeigen Guts und Ehre,
daß sie ihr Amt mit Freuden tun,
und nicht mit Seufzen schwere,
dann solches ist uns ja nicht gut,
wie uns dein Wort selbst lehren tut;
davor wollst uns behüten.


View article...


View article...

Received for Review

 



Chute, Anthony L., Christopher W. Morgan, and Robert A. Peterson, Editors. Why We Belong: Evangelical Unity and Denominational Diversity. Wheaton: Crossway, 2013. 251 Pages. Paper. $18.99. www.crossway.org (LHP)


View article...